A Nonlinear Approach in the Quantification of Numerical Uncertainty by High-Order Methods for Compressible Turbulence with Shocks

This is a comprehensive overview on our research work to link interdisciplinary modeling and simulation techniques to improve the predictability and reliability simulations (PARs) of compressible turbulence with shock waves for general audiences who are not familiar with our nonlinear approach. This focused nonlinear approach is to integrate our “nonlinear dynamical approach” with our “newly developed high order entropy-conserving, momentum-conserving and kinetic energy-preserving methods” in the quantification of numerical uncertainty in highly nonlinear flow simulations. The central issue is that the solution space of discrete genuinely nonlinear systems is much larger than that of the corresponding genuinely nonlinear continuous systems, thus obtaining numerical solutions that might not be solutions of the continuous systems. Traditional uncertainty quantification (UQ) approaches in numerical simulations commonly employ linearized analysis that might not provide the true behavior of genuinely nonlinear physical fluid flows. Due to the rapid development of high-performance computing, the last two decades have been an era when computation is ahead of analysis and when very large-scale practical computations are increasingly used in poorly understood multiscale data-limited complex nonlinear physical problems and non-traditional fields. This is compounded by the fact that the numerical schemes used in production computational fluid dynamics (CFD) computer codes often do not take into consideration the genuinely nonlinear behavior of numerical methods for more realistic modeling and simulations. Often, the numerical methods used might have been developed for weakly nonlinear flow or different flow types other than the flow being investigated. In addition, some of these methods are not discretely physics-preserving (structure-preserving); this includes but is not limited to entropy-conserving, momentum-conserving and kinetic energy-preserving methods. Employing theories of nonlinear dynamics to guide the construction of more appropriate, stable and accurate numerical methods could help, e.g., (a) delineate solutions of the discretized counterparts but not solutions of the governing equations; (b) prevent numerical chaos or numerical “turbulence” leading to FALSE predication of transition to turbulence; (c) provide more reliable numerical simulations of nonlinear fluid dynamical systems, especially by direct numerical simulations (DNS), large eddy simulations (LES) and implicit large eddy simulations (ILES) simulations; and (d) prevent incorrect computed shock speeds for problems containing stiff nonlinear source terms, if present. For computation intensive turbulent flows, the desirable methods should also be efficient and exhibit scalable parallelism for current high-performance computing. Selected numerical examples to illustrate the genuinely nonlinear behavior of numerical methods and our integrated approach to improve PARs are included.