Role of MRI in classification and preoperative evaluation of perianal fistula

Abstract Background A fistula is an unusual communication between the skin and an inward organ or between the organs. The current study aimed to determine the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis, description, and classification of fistula-in-ano. Additionally, the study aimed to compare the MRI findings with the operative findings, which is considered the gold standard in our study. Methods The present study is a prospective study and was carried out on a group of 61 patients: 52 males and 9 females with a mean age of 41 years, who were suspected to have perianal fistulae presented clinically with discharge or localized pain or were asymptomatic. A preoperative MRI was conducted for fistula-in-ano evaluation in these patients from October 2019 till the end of October 2021. A surgeon conducted a physical examination of all patients to document the number and location of cutaneous openings following a full medical history. The MRI images were evaluated and interpreted by multiple expert radiologists who had more than 5 years of experience in analyzing MRI. In the cases (in 3 cases, 4.92%) where there were discrepancies in their interpretations, a senior radiologist’s evaluation was considered the final result and was confirmed surgically. Subsequently, the MRI findings were correlated with surgical findings to indicate the specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of such MRI findings. Results The MRI technique was the routine (i.e., without contrast administration) technique in 36 (59.02%) patients, with contrast administration in 21 (34.43%) patients and with anesthesia/sedation (uncomfortable, anxious, and claustrophobic patients need to minimize their motion artifact to improve the quality and obtain more detailed images) in 4 (6.56%) patients. The MRI pathology of the studied patients revealed normal findings in 1 (1.64%) patient, anal fissure/early developing tract in 6 (9.84%) patients, and established tract (sinus/fistula) in 54 (88.52%) patients. Park’s and St. James's University Hospital classifications were utilized to categorize the patients, with the most common fistula types based on the Park’s classification: intersphincteric (44.3%) and transsphincteric (29.5%). Based on the St. James’s classification, grade 1 (intersphincteric (34.4%)) and grade 4 (transsphincteric with abscess/side branch (16.4%)) were the most prevalent. A substantial consensus was reached between MRI and surgery findings for classifying tracts, side branches, and abscesses formation with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 85.71%, and 98.36%, respectively. Conclusions MRI is a valuable tool in managing patients with perianal fistulas due to its ability to detect hidden areas of infection (such as abscesses) and secondary extensions. These factors contribute to the high recurrence rate after surgery. Additionally, MR imaging can define the anatomical relationships between the fistula and anal sphincters, helping to predict the likelihood of fecal incontinence following surgery.