Back to Search
Start Over
How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities
- Source :
- JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol 5, Iss 8, p e106 (2017)
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- JMIR Publications, 2017.
-
Abstract
- BackgroundAs commercially available activity trackers are being utilized in clinical trials, the research community remains uncertain about reliability of the trackers, particularly in studies that involve walking aids and low-intensity activities. While these trackers have been tested for reliability during walking and running activities, there has been limited research on validating them during low-intensity activities and walking with assistive tools. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to (1) determine the accuracy of 3 Fitbit devices (ie, Zip, One, and Flex) at different wearing positions (ie, pants pocket, chest, and wrist) during walking at 3 different speeds, 2.5, 5, and 8 km/h, performed by healthy adults on a treadmill; (2) determine the accuracy of the mentioned trackers worn at different sites during activities of daily living; and (3) examine whether intensity of physical activity (PA) impacts the choice of optimal wearing site of the tracker. MethodsWe recruited 15 healthy young adults to perform 6 PAs while wearing 3 Fitbit devices (ie, Zip, One, and Flex) on their chest, pants pocket, and wrist. The activities include walking at 2.5, 5, and 8 km/h, pushing a shopping cart, walking with aid of a walker, and eating while sitting. We compared the number of steps counted by each tracker with gold standard numbers. We performed multiple statistical analyses to compute descriptive statistics (ie, ANOVA test), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), mean absolute error rate, and correlation by comparing the tracker-recorded data with that of the gold standard. ResultsAll the 3 trackers demonstrated good-to-excellent (ICC>0.75) correlation with the gold standard step counts during treadmill experiments. The correlation was poor (ICC
- Subjects :
- Information technology
T58.5-58.64
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 22915222
- Volume :
- 5
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- Journal :
- JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsdoj.f74ee731f3b455eb5510c8ef3e26f1f
- Document Type :
- article
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6321