Back to Search Start Over

Melphalan 140 mg/m2 or 200 mg/m2 for autologous transplantation in myeloma: results from the Collaboration to Collect Autologous Transplant Outcomes in Lymphoma and Myeloma (CALM) study. A report by the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party

Authors :
Holger W. Auner
Simona Iacobelli
Giulia Sbianchi
Cora Knol-Bout
Didier Blaise
Nigel H. Russell
Jane F. Apperley
David Pohlreich
Paul V. Browne
Guido Kobbe
Cecilia Isaksson
Stig Lenhoff
Christof Scheid
Cyrille Touzeau
Esa Jantunen
Achilles Anagnostopoulos
Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha
Alina Tanase
Nicolaas Schaap
Wieslaw Wiktor-Jedrzejczak
Marta Krejci
Stefan O. Schönland
Curly Morris
Laurent Garderet
Nicolaus Kröger
Source :
Haematologica, Vol 103, Iss 3 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Ferrata Storti Foundation, 2018.

Abstract

Melphalan at a dose of 200 mg/m2 is standard conditioning prior to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma, but a dose of 140 mg/m2 is often used in clinical practice in patients perceived to be at risk of excess toxicity. To determine whether melphalan 200 mg/m2 and melphalan 140 mg/m2 are equally effective and tolerable in clinically relevant patient subgroups we analyzed 1964 first single autologous transplantation episodes using a series of Cox proportional-hazards models. Overall survival, progression-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, hematopoietic recovery and second primary malignancy rates were not significantly different between the melphalan 140 mg/m2 (n=245) and melphalan 200 mg/m2 (n=1719) groups. Multivariable subgroup analysis showed that disease status at transplantation interacted with overall survival, progression-free survival, and cumulative incidence of relapse, with a significant advantage associated with melphalan 200 mg/m2 in patients transplanted in less than partial response (adjusted hazard ratios for melphalan 200 mg/m2 versus melphalan 140 mg/m2: 0.5, 0.54, and 0.56). In contrast, transplantation in very good partial or complete response significantly favored melphalan 140 mg/m2 for overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.02). Age, renal function, prior proteasome inhibitor treatment, gender, or Karnofsky score did not interact with overall/progression-free survival or relapse rate in the melphalan dose groups. There were no significant survival or relapse rate differences between melphalan 200 mg/m2 and melphalan 140 mg/m2 patients with high-risk or standard-risk chromosomal abnormalities. In conclusion, remission status at the time of transplantation may favor the use of melphalan 200 mg/m2 or melphalan 140 mg/m2 for key transplant outcomes (NCT01362972).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03906078 and 15928721
Volume :
103
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Haematologica
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.f705fa443a5b491689e9661527014272
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.181339