Back to Search Start Over

The prevalence of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in patients with sepsis – a secondary analysis of two German multicenter randomized controlled trials

Authors :
Thomas Schmoch
Patrick Möhnle
Markus A. Weigand
Josef Briegel
Michael Bauer
Frank Bloos
Patrick Meybohm
Didier Keh
Markus Löffler
Gunnar Elke
Thorsten Brenner
Holger Bogatsch
for the SepNet–Critical Care Trials Group
Source :
Annals of Intensive Care, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
SpringerOpen, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Background Sepsis and septic shock are frequently accompanied by coagulopathy. Since the sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score was first described, subsequent studies from Asia revealed a SIC prevalence of 40–60%. In Europe, however, SIC prevalence in patients fulfilling sepsis criteria according to the third international consensus definition (SEPSIS-3) has not yet been evaluated. Methods The Critical Care Trials Group of the German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet) conducted a secondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Only patients fulfilling sepsis criteria according SEPSIS-3 were included in this secondary analysis. In a two step approach, SIC prevalence was determined in 267 patients with sepsis but not septic shock (at the time of inclusion) from the “Effect of Hydrocortisone on Development of Shock Among Patients With Severe Sepsis” (HYPRESS) trial. Then, we estimated SIC prevalence in 1,018 patients from the “Effect of Sodium Selenite Administration and Procalcitonin-Guided Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock” (SISPCT) trial using a simplified SIC score based on the platelet-SIC-subscore (PSSC). Study aims were to assess (i) the prevalence of SIC in patients with SEPSIS-3, (ii) the association of SIC with 90-day mortality and morbidity, (iii) the time when patients become SIC positive during the course of sepsis, and (iv) the value of the PSSC for predicting SIC. Results In the HYPRESS trial, SIC prevalence was 22.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.5–27.5%). The estimated SIC prevalence in the SISPCT trial was 24.2% (95% CI 21.6–26.9%). In the HYPRESS trial, SIC was associated with significantly higher 90-day mortality (13.9% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.027) and morbidity. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, treatment arm, and (SIC-adapted) SOFA score confirmed the negative association of SIC with survival (p = 0.011). In the SISPCT trial, increased PSSCs were associated with higher 90-day mortality (PSSC 0: 34.4%, PSSC 1: 40.5%, PSSC 2: 53.3%; p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21105820
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Annals of Intensive Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.f6cc7bc3380d48488dc763c26d9d58a7
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01093-7