Back to Search Start Over

Economic evaluation of second measles containing vaccine (MCV) dose: a systematic review of available evidence

Authors :
Samuel Bawa
Abrham Wondimu
Maarten J. Postma
Raymond Hutubessy
Marinus van Hulst
Source :
Expert Review of Vaccines, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 655-673 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Taylor & Francis Group, 2024.

Abstract

Introduction The global measles incidence has decreased from 145 to 49 cases per 1 million population from 2000 to 2018, but evaluating the economic benefits of a second measles-containing vaccine (MCV2) is crucial. This study reviewed the evidence and quality of economic evaluation studies to guide MCV2 introduction.Methods The systematic review of model-based economic evaluation studies was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search yielded 2231 articles, with 876 duplicates removed and 1355 articles screened, with nine studies included for final analysis.Results Six studies reported a positive benefit–cost ratio with one resulting in net savings of $11.6 billion, and two studies estimated a 2-dose MMR vaccination program would save $119.24 to prevent one measles case, and a second dose could prevent 9,200 cases at 18 months, saving $548.19 per case. The most sensitive variables were the discount rate and vaccination administration cost.Conclusions Two MCV doses or a second opportunity with an additional dose of MCV were highly cost-beneficial and resulted in substantial cost savings compared to a single routine vaccine. But further research using high-quality model-based health economic evaluation studies of MCV2 should be made available to decision-makers.PROSPERO Registration CRD42020200669

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14760584 and 17448395
Volume :
23
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Expert Review of Vaccines
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.f4dde6663d364afeb9ed639b92d868b9
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2024.2367451