Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic performance of MRI, SPECT, and PET in detecting renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors :
Qihua Yin
Huiting Xu
Yanqi Zhong
Jianming Ni
Shudong Hu
Source :
BMC Cancer, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
BMC, 2022.

Abstract

Abstract Background Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Noninvasive imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET), have been involved in increasing evolution to detect RCC. This meta-analysis aims to compare to compare the performance of MRI, SPECT, and PET in the detection of RCC in humans, and to provide evidence for decision-making in terms of further research and clinical settings. Methods Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systemically searched. The keywords such as “magnetic resonance imaging”, “MRI”, “single-photon emission computed tomography”, “SPECT”, “positron emission tomography”, “PET”, “renal cell carcinoma” were used for the search. Studies concerning MRI, SPECT, and PET for the detection of RCC were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC), etc. were calculated. Results A total of 44 articles were finally detected for inclusion in this study. The pooled sensitivities of MRI, 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT were 0.80, 0.83, and 0.89, respectively. Their respective overall specificities were 0.90, 0.86, and 0.88. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI studies at 1.5 T were 0.86 and 0.94, respectively. With respect to prospective PET studies, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 0.90, 0.93 and 0.97, respectively. In the detection of primary RCC, PET studies manifested a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.77, 0.80, and 0.84, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of PET/CT studies in detecting primary RCC were 0.80, 0.85, and 0.89. Conclusion Our study manifests that MRI and PET/CT present better diagnostic value for the detection of RCC in comparison with PET. MRI is superior in the diagnosis of primary RCC.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712407
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.f0dd0b3a395d4425af520f37357953d6
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09239-3