Back to Search Start Over

Early initiation of home-based sensori-motor training improves muscle strength, activation and size in patients after knee replacement: a secondary analysis of a controlled clinical trial

Authors :
Maria Moutzouri
Fiona Coutts
John Gliatis
Evdokia Billis
Elias Tsepis
Nigel Gleeson
Source :
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
BMC, 2019.

Abstract

Abstract Background There is accumulating evidence for the advantages of rehabilitation involving sensori-motor training (SMT) following total knee replacement (TKR). However, the best way in which to deliver SMT remains elusive because of potential interference effects amongst concurrent exercise stimuli for optimal neuromuscular and morphological adaptations. The aim of this study was to use additional outcomes (i.e. muscle strength, activation and size) from a published parent study to compare the effects of early-initiated home-based rehabilitative SMT with functional exercise training (usual care) in patients undergoing TKR. Methods A controlled clinical trial was conducted at the Orthopedic University Hospital of Rion, Greece involving allocation concealment to patients. Fifty-two patients electing to undergo TKR were randomised to either early-initiated SMT [experimental] or functional exercise training [control] in a home-based environment. Groups were prescribed equivalent duration of exercise during 12-weeks, 3–5 sessions of ~ 40 min per week of home-based programmes. Muscle strength and activation (peak force [PF]; peak amplitude [Peak Amp.] and root mean square of integrated electromyography [RMS iEMG]), muscular size (including rectus femoris muscle cross-sectional area [CSARF]), and knee ROM were assessed on three separate occasions (pre-surgery [0 weeks]; 8 weeks post-surgery; 14 weeks post-surgery). Results Patients undertaking SMT rehabilitation showed significantly greater improvements over the 14 weeks compared to control in outcomes including quadriceps PF (25.1 ± 18.5 N vs 12.4 ± 20.8 N); iPeak Amp. (188 ± 109.5% vs 25 ± 105.8%); CSARF (252.0 ± 101.0 mm2 vs 156.7 ± 76.2 mm2), respectively (p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712474
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.bebb5a20e8cf48abb3195479f06a748e
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2575-3