Back to Search Start Over

A restriction enzyme reduced representation sequencing approach for low-cost, high-throughput metagenome profiling.

Authors :
Melanie K Hess
Suzanne J Rowe
Tracey C Van Stijn
Hannah M Henry
Sharon M Hickey
Rudiger Brauning
Alan F McCulloch
Andrew S Hess
Michelle R Kirk
Sandeep Kumar
Cesar Pinares-Patiño
Sandra Kittelmann
Graham R Wood
Peter H Janssen
John C McEwan
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 4, p e0219882 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2020.

Abstract

Microbial community profiles have been associated with a variety of traits, including methane emissions in livestock. These profiles can be difficult and expensive to obtain for thousands of samples (e.g. for accurate association of microbial profiles with traits), therefore the objective of this work was to develop a low-cost, high-throughput approach to capture the diversity of the rumen microbiome. Restriction enzyme reduced representation sequencing (RE-RRS) using ApeKI or PstI, and two bioinformatic pipelines (reference-based and reference-free) were compared to bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing using repeated samples collected two weeks apart from 118 sheep that were phenotypically extreme (60 high and 58 low) for methane emitted per kg dry matter intake (n = 236). DNA was extracted from freeze-dried rumen samples using a phenol chloroform and bead-beating protocol prior to RE-RRS. The resulting sequences were used to investigate the repeatability of the rumen microbial community profiles, the effect of laboratory and analytical method, and the relationship with methane production. The results suggested that the best method was PstI RE-RRS analyzed with the reference-free approach, which accounted for 53.3±5.9% of reads, and had repeatabilities of 0.49±0.07 and 0.50±0.07 for the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2), phenotypic correlations with methane yield of 0.43±0.06 and 0.46±0.06 for PC1 and PC2, and explained 41±8% of the variation in methane yield. These results were significantly better than for bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the same samples (p

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine
Science

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
15
Issue :
4
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.beb729cd543b4f619152e77dff449d47
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219882