Back to Search
Start Over
Safety of oral methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain
- Source :
- Journal of Pain Research, Vol Volume 12, Pp 139-150 (2018)
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- Dove Medical Press, 2018.
-
Abstract
- Richard L Rauck,1 Neal E Slatkin,2,3 Nancy Stambler,4 Robert J Israel3 1Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; 2School of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA; 3Medical Affairs, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, NJ, USA; 4Clinical Research, Progenics Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY, USA Purpose: Oral methylnaltrexone was shown to be effective in treating opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic noncancer pain in a Phase III randomized controlled trial. This report provides a detailed safety analysis from that study. Methods: Adults (n=803) with chronic noncancer pain for ≥2 months and confirmed OIC while receiving opioid doses ≥50 mg morphine equivalent per day for ≥14 days were randomized 1:1:1:1 to oral methylnaltrexone (150, 300, or 450 mg) or placebo once daily for 4 weeks, followed by as-needed use for 8 weeks. Safety was evaluated by examining treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), clinical laboratory parameters, vital signs, electrocardiography, rescue-laxative and opioid use, Objective Opioid Withdrawal Scale (OOWS) and Subjective Opioid Withdrawal Scale (SOWS), and pain-intensity scores. Results: TEAEs occurred at a similar incidence in the methylnaltrexone groups (59.0%) and placebo group (63.0%). The most common TEAEs with methylnaltrexone were abdominal pain (8.0% vs 8.5% with placebo), nausea (6.8% vs 9.0%), and diarrhea (6.0% vs 3.5%). Cardiac-related TEAEs occurred in 1.8% and 1.0% of patients, respectively, and no major adverse cardiovascular events were reported. No patient had a cluster of TEAEs associated with opioid withdrawal after excluding gastrointestinal TEAEs. Changes in laboratory parameters, vital signs, and electrocardiography were generally small and similar across treatment groups. Rescue-laxative use was more common with placebo than methylnaltrexone 450 mg (6.20% vs 4.27% of study days, P=0.024). Changes in opioid dose, OOWS and SOWS scores, and pain-intensity scores during treatment were minimal. Conclusion: Oral methylnaltrexone had a safety profile comparable with placebo in the treatment of OIC in patients with chronic noncancer pain, with no evidence of cardiac toxicity or opioid withdrawal. Keywords: analgesia, µ-opioid-receptor antagonist, nonmalignant, safety
- Subjects :
- analgesia
µ-opioid receptor antagonist
nonmalignant
safety
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 11787090
- Volume :
- ume 12
- Database :
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- Journal :
- Journal of Pain Research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsdoj.bd8e207a22c4e4e836876f84fabb79b
- Document Type :
- article