Back to Search Start Over

Non-cancer clinical trials start-up metrics at an academic medical center: Implications for advancing research

Authors :
Colin Cernik
Elena Shergina
Jeffrey Thompson
Karen Blackwell
Kyle Stephens
Kim S. Kimminau
Jo Wick
Matthew S. Mayo
Byron Gajewski
Jianghua He
Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam
Source :
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, Vol 22, Iss , Pp 100774- (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2021.

Abstract

The primary goal for any clinical trial after it receives a funding notification is to receive regulatory approval and initiate the trial for recruitment. Every trial must go through documentation and regulatory process before it can start recruiting participants and collecting data; this initial process of review and approval is known as the study start-up process (SSU). We evaluated the average time taken for studies to receive approvals. Using data from clinical trials conducted at the University of Kansas Medical Center, various times to reach the start of the study were calculated based on the dates of individual study. The results of this analysis showed that chart review studies and investigator-initiated trials had a shorter time to activation than other types of studies. Additionally, single-center studies had a shorter activation time than multi-center studies. The analysis also demonstrated that the overall processing time consistently had been reduced over time.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
24518654
Volume :
22
Issue :
100774-
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.bbbcf24d15494557800d80e8fd12c0be
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100774