Back to Search Start Over

Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus 0·5% timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma in Tanzania: a randomised controlled trial

Authors :
Heiko Philippin, MD
Einoti Matayan, MMed
Karin M Knoll, MD
Edith Macha, Pharm Tech
Sia Mbishi, BSc
Andrew Makupa, MMed
Cristóvão Matsinhe, MMed
Vasco da Gama, MMed
Mario Monjane, MMed
Awum Joyce Ncheda, MMed
Francisco Alcides Mulobuana, MMed
Elisante Muna, MMed
Nelly Fopoussi, MMed
Gus Gazzard, ProfFRCOphth
Ana Patricia Marques, PhD
Peter Shah, ProfFRCOphth
David Macleod, PhD
William U Makupa, MMed
Matthew J Burton, ProfPhD
Source :
The Lancet Global Health, Vol 9, Iss 11, Pp e1589-e1599 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2021.

Abstract

Summary: Background: Glaucoma is a major cause of sight loss worldwide, with the highest regional prevalence and incidence reported in Africa. The most common low-cost treatment used to control glaucoma is long-term timolol eye drops. However, low adherence is a major challenge. We aimed to investigate whether selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) was superior to timolol eye drops for controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Methods: We did a two-arm, parallel-group, single-masked randomised controlled trial at the Eye Department of Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) had open-angle glaucoma and an IOP above 21 mm Hg, and did not have asthma or a history of glaucoma surgery or laser. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 0·5% timolol eye drops to administer twice daily or to receive SLT. The primary outcome was the proportion of eyes from both groups with treatment success, defined as an IOP below or equal to target pressure according to glaucoma severity, at 12 months following randomisation. Re-explanation of eye drop application or a repeat SLT was permitted once. The primary analysis was by modified intention-to-treat, excluding participants lost to follow-up, using logistic regression; generalised estimating equations were used to adjust for the correlation between eyes. This trial was registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR201508001235339. Findings: 840 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 201 (24%) participants (382 eligible eyes) were enrolled between Aug 31, 2015, and May 12, 2017. 100 (50%) participants (191 eyes) were randomly assigned to the timolol group and 101 (50%; 191 eyes) to the SLT group. After 1 year, 339 (89%) of 382 eyes were analysed. Treatment was successful in 55 (31%) of 176 eyes in the timolol group (16 [29%] of 55 eyes required repeat administration counselling) and in 99 (61%) of 163 eyes in the SLT group (33 [33%] of 99 eyes required repeat SLT; odds ratio 3·37 [95% CI 1·96–5·80]; p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2214109X
Volume :
9
Issue :
11
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
The Lancet Global Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b9b8403ea26444c81800d7f9d9c086e
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00348-X