Back to Search Start Over

Machine Learning Improves Risk Stratification in Myelofibrosis: An Analysis of the Spanish Registry of Myelofibrosis

Authors :
Adrián Mosquera-Orgueira
Manuel Pérez-Encinas
Alberto Hernández-Sánchez
Teresa González-Martínez
Eduardo Arellano-Rodrigo
Javier Martínez-Elicegui
Ángela Villaverde-Ramiro
José-María Raya
Rosa Ayala
Francisca Ferrer-Marín
María-Laura Fox
Patricia Velez
Elvira Mora
Blanca Xicoy
María-Isabel Mata-Vázquez
María García-Fortes
Anna Angona
Beatriz Cuevas
María-Alicia Senín
Angel Ramírez-Payer
María-José Ramírez
Raúl Pérez-López
Sonia González de Villambrosía
Clara Martínez-Valverde
María-Teresa Gómez-Casares
Carmen García-Hernández
Mercedes Gasior
Beatriz Bellosillo
Juan-Luis Steegmann
Alberto Álvarez-Larrán
Jesús María Hernández-Rivas
Juan Carlos Hernández-Boluda
on behalf of the Spanish MPN Group (GEMFIN).
Source :
HemaSphere, Vol 7, Iss 1, p e818 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Wiley, 2023.

Abstract

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) with heterogeneous clinical course. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation remains the only curative therapy, but its morbidity and mortality require careful candidate selection. Therefore, accurate disease risk prognostication is critical for treatment decision-making. We obtained registry data from patients diagnosed with MF in 60 Spanish institutions (N = 1386). These were randomly divided into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%). A machine learning (ML) technique (random forest) was used to model overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) in the training set, and the results were validated in the test set. We derived the AIPSS-MF (Artificial Intelligence Prognostic Scoring System for Myelofibrosis) model, which was based on 8 clinical variables at diagnosis and achieved high accuracy in predicting OS (training set c-index, 0.750; test set c-index, 0.744) and LFS (training set c-index, 0.697; test set c-index, 0.703). No improvement was obtained with the inclusion of MPN driver mutations in the model. We were unable to adequately assess the potential benefit of including adverse cytogenetics or high-risk mutations due to the lack of these data in many patients. AIPSS-MF was superior to the IPSS regardless of MF subtype and age range and outperformed the MYSEC-PM in patients with secondary MF. In conclusion, we have developed a prediction model based exclusively on clinical variables that provides individualized prognostic estimates in patients with primary and secondary MF. The use of AIPSS-MF in combination with predictive models that incorporate genetic information may improve disease risk stratification.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25729241 and 00000000
Volume :
7
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
HemaSphere
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b80233d27d284aceb361680826fa5bb8
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000818