Back to Search Start Over

Effect of Prewarming on Perioperative Hypothermia in Patients Undergoing Loco-Regional or General Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Authors :
Jesus Recio-Pérez
Miguel Miró Murillo
Marta Martin Mesa
Javier Silva García
Cristina Santonocito
Filippo Sanfilippo
Angel Asúnsolo
Source :
Medicina, Vol 59, Iss 12, p 2082 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2023.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Redistribution hypothermia occurs during anesthesia despite active intraoperative warming. Prewarming increases the heat absorption by peripheral tissue, reducing the central to peripheral heat gradient. Therefore, the addition of prewarming may offer a greater preservation of intraoperative normothermia as compared to intraoperative warming only. Materials and Methods: A single-center clinical trial of adults scheduled for non-cardiac surgery. Patients were randomized to receive or not a prewarming period (at least 10 min) with convective air devices. Intraoperative temperature management was identical in both groups and performed according to a local protocol. The primary endpoint was the incidence, the magnitude and the duration of hypothermia (according to surgical time) between anesthetic induction and arrival at the recovery room. Secondary outcomes were core temperature on arrival in operating room, surgical site infections, blood losses, transfusions, patient discomfort (i.e., shivering), reintervention and hospital stay. Results: In total, 197 patients were analyzed: 104 in the control group and 93 in the prewarming group. Core temperature during the intra-operative period was similar between groups (p = 0.45). Median prewarming lasted 27 (17–38) min. Regarding hypothermia, we found no differences in incidence (controls: 33.7%, prewarming: 39.8%; p = 0.37), duration (controls: 41.6% (17.8–78.1), prewarming: 45.2% (20.6–71.1); p = 0.83) and magnitude (controls: 0.19 °C · h−1 (0.09–0.54), prewarming: 0.20 °C · h−1 (0.05–0.70); p = 0.91). Preoperative thermal discomfort was more frequent in the prewarming group (15.1% vs. 0%; p < 0.01). The interruption of intraoperative warming was more common in the prewarming group (16.1% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.03), but no differences were seen in other secondary endpoints. Conclusions: A preoperative prewarming period does not reduce the incidence, duration and magnitude of intraoperative hypothermia. These results should be interpreted considering a strict protocol for perioperative temperature management and the low incidence of hypothermia in controls.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16489144 and 1010660X
Volume :
59
Issue :
12
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Medicina
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b5d109dcb0a0439d9accb9cebb72c49b
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59122082