Prospective Observational Study for the Comparison of Screening Methods Including Tongue Pressure and Repetitive Saliva Swallowing With Detailed Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study Findings in Patients With Acute Stroke

Background Simple, noninvasive, and repeatable screening methods are essential for assessing swallowing disorders. We focused on patients with acute stroke and aimed to assess the characteristics of swallowing screening tests, including the modified Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability score, tongue pressure, and repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST), compared with detailed videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) findings to contribute as a helpful resource for their comprehensive and complementary use. Methods and Results We enrolled first‐ever patients with acute stroke conducting simultaneous assessments, including VFSS, modified Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability score, tongue pressure measurement, and RSST. VFSS assessed aspiration, laryngeal penetration, oral cavity residue, vallecular residue, pharyngeal residue, and swallowing reflex delay. Screening tests were compared with VFSS findings, and multiple logistic analysis determined variable importance. Cutoff values for each abnormal VFSS finding were assessed using receiver operating characteristic analyses. We evaluated 346 patients (70.5±12.6 years of age, 143 women). The modified Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability score was significantly associated with all findings except aspiration. Tongue pressure was significantly associated with oral cavity and pharyngeal residue. The RSST was significantly associated with all findings except oral cavity residue. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that the minimum cutoff value for all VFSS abnormal findings was RSST ≤2. Conclusions The modified Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability is useful for broadly detecting swallowing disorders but may miss mild issues and aspiration. The RSST, with a score of ≤2, is valuable for indicating abnormal VFSS findings. Tongue pressure, especially in oral and pharyngeal residues, is useful. Combining these tests might enhance accuracy of the swallowing evaluation.