Back to Search Start Over

Clinical usefulness of newly developed prognostic predictive score for atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma

Authors :
Hideko Ohama
Atsushi Hiraoka
Toshifumi Tada
Masashi Hirooka
Kazuya Kariyama
Takeshi Hatanaka
Joji Tani
Koichi Takaguchi
Masanori Atsukawa
Ei Itobayashi
Takashi Nishimura
Kunihiko Tsuji
Kazuto Tajiri
Toru Ishikawa
Satoshi Yasuda
Hidenori Toyoda
Shinya Fukunishi
Chikara Ogawa
Satoru Kakizaki
Noritomo Shimada
Atsushi Naganuma
Kazuhito Kawata
Hisashi Kosaka
Hidekatsu Kuroda
Tomomitsu Matono
Yutaka Yata
Hironori Ochi
Fujimasa Tada
Kazuhiro Nouso
Asahiro Morishita
Norio Itokawa
Tomomi Okubo
Taeang Arai
Akemi Tsutsui
Takuya Nagano
Keisuke Yokohama
Hiroki Nishikawa
Michitaka Imai
Yohei Koizumi
Shinichiro Nakamura
Hiroko Iijima
Masaki Kaibori
Yoichi Hiasa
Takashi Kumada
Representing the Real‐life Practice Experts for HCC Study Group with Hepatocellular Carcinoma experts from 48 clinics in Japan (RELPEC/HCC 48 Group)
Source :
Cancer Reports, Vol 7, Iss 4, Pp n/a-n/a (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Wiley, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Aims The aim of the present study was to elucidate detailed parameters for prediction of prognosis for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) treatment. Methods A total of 719 patients (males 577, median age 74 years) treated with Atez/Bev between September 2020 and January 2023 were enrolled. Factors related to overall survival (OS) were extracted and a prognostic scoring system based on hazard ratio (HR) was created. OS and progression‐free survival (PFS) were retrospectively examined, and the prognostic ability of the newly developed system was compared to CRAFITY score using concordance index (c‐index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) results. Results Cox‐hazards multivariate analysis showed BCLC classification C/D (HR 1.4; 1 point), AFP ≥100 ng/mL (HR 1.4; 1 point), mALBI 2a (HR 1.7; 1 point), mALBI 2b/3 (HR 2.8; 2 points), and DCP ≥100 mAU/mL (HR 1.6; 1 point) as significant factors. The assigned points were added and used to develop the IMmunotherapy with AFP, BCLC staging, mALBI, and DCP evaluation (IMABALI‐De) scoring system. For IMABALI‐De scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, OS was not applicable (NA), NA, 26.11, 18.79, 14.07, and 8.32 months, respectively (p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25738348
Volume :
7
Issue :
4
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Cancer Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b2c34e45940412fa92f5beffa4e949a
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.2042