Back to Search Start Over

Educating Hematology-Oncology Fellows About How to Communicate with Patients About Clinical Trials: A Needs Assessment

Authors :
Naomi D. Parker
Martina C. Murphy
Susan Eggly
Elisa S. Weiss
Tithi B. Amin
Easton N. Wollney
Kevin B. Wright
Daphne R. Friedman
Maria Sae-Hau
Andrea Sitlinger
Stephanie A. S. Staras
Leah Szumita
Eric Cooks
Carma L. Bylund
Source :
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, Vol 11 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
SAGE Publishing, 2024.

Abstract

Objectives Only 5–8% of adults with cancer participate in cancer clinical trials (CCTs), with even lower rates among underrepresented groups. Improving oncologists’ communication skills may enhance the frequency and quality of their discussions with patients about CCTs, consequently increasing participation. However, little is known about interest in or presence of CCT-related communication training during Hematology-Oncology (Hem-Onc) fellowships. This study aimed to describe, from the perspective of Hem-Onc fellowship program directors (PDs): (1) the current landscape of CCT education for Hem-Onc fellows; (2) the acceptability and feasibility of implementing a CCT communication skills workshop for Hem-Onc fellows. Methods We used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach. PDs were surveyed and interviewed about their graduate medical education (GME) programs’ current CCT curriculum, training challenges, fellows’ CCT knowledge and CCT communication skills, and preferences for a CCT communication workshop. Results PDs were surveyed (n = 40) and interviewed (n = 12). PDs reported that their institutions prioritize CCT accrual (M = 4.58, SD = .78; 1-5 scale, 5 = “Strongly Agree”) and clinical research training (M = 4.20, SD = .85). CCT skills that programs least often addressed were how to (1) discuss CCTs with newly diagnosed patients, (2) talk to patients about CCTs when none are available, and (3) help patients find CCTs at other institutions. PDs were interested in a CCT communication workshop for fellows (“yes” = 67.5%, “maybe” = 32.5%) and said training would be feasible (M = 4.28, SD = .78) and useful (M = 4.47, SD = .78). Qualitative results described programs’ current approaches to CCT education and insights about developing and implementing CCT communication training. Conclusions There is a clear need to improve CCT communication skills training in Hem-Onc fellowship programs and to implement and scale such training to increase CCT participation, especially among diverse patient populations. Furthermore, Hem-Onc GME PDs view such training as feasible and useful.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23821205
Volume :
11
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b22bbc8056b94d66b6714eab0bd20210
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241269376