Back to Search Start Over

A Comparison on Physical and Rheological Properties of Three Different Waste Plastic-Modified Bitumen

Authors :
Nuha Mashaan
Amin Chegenizadeh
Hamid Nikraz
Source :
Recycling, Vol 7, Iss 2, p 18 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2022.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effect and the possibility of using waste plastic as a sustainable cost-effective polymer to modify bitumen binders. Different types of waste plastic have been used in this modification, including polyethylene terephthalate (PET), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and low-density polyethylene (LDPE). The modification targets the physical characteristics, rheological properties, and binders’ resistance to ageing. Both long- and short-term ageing are investigated to determine the durability and ageing resistance of the modified binder using rolling thin film oven tests (RTFOT) and pressure ageing vessels (PAVs). Penetration tests and dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) tests were conducted to investigate and evaluate the complex shear modulus, stiffness, elasticity, and viscous properties. The results show that 2% and 4% of HDPE and LDPE are recommended as ideal contents for good performance, as reflected by the penetration tests before and after ageing. However, higher contents, such as 6% and 8% HDPE and LDPE, are not significant in improving the stiffness, elasticity, and ageing resistance. Therefore, samples of 6–8% HDPE and LDPE are more vulnerable to permanent deformation. Furthermore, using waste PET exhibits obvious improvements in terms of the physical characteristics, rheological properties, stiffness, elasticity, and ageing resistance with up to 8% PET-modified bitumen. Based on the results, the ideal type and content is 6–8% PET waste plastic.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23134321
Volume :
7
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Recycling
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.9b63be87636c42428aa13bac2cf4d092
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling7020018