Back to Search Start Over

Flooding and mental health: a systematic mapping review.

Authors :
Ana Fernandez
John Black
Mairwen Jones
Leigh Wilson
Luis Salvador-Carulla
Thomas Astell-Burt
Deborah Black
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 10, Iss 4, p e0119929 (2015)
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Floods are the most common type of global natural disaster. Floods have a negative impact on mental health. Comprehensive evaluation and review of the literature are lacking. OBJECTIVE:To systematically map and review available scientific evidence on mental health impacts of floods caused by extended periods of heavy rain in river catchments. METHODS:We performed a systematic mapping review of published scientific literature in five languages for mixed studies on floods and mental health. PUBMED and Web of Science were searched to identify all relevant articles from 1994 to May 2014 (no restrictions). RESULTS:The electronic search strategy identified 1331 potentially relevant papers. Finally, 83 papers met the inclusion criteria. Four broad areas are identified: i) the main mental health disorders-post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety; ii] the factors associated with mental health among those affected by floods; iii) the narratives associated with flooding, which focuses on the long-term impacts of flooding on mental health as a consequence of the secondary stressors; and iv) the management actions identified. The quantitative and qualitative studies have consistent findings. However, very few studies have used mixed methods to quantify the size of the mental health burden as well as exploration of in-depth narratives. Methodological limitations include control of potential confounders and short-term follow up. LIMITATIONS:Floods following extreme events were excluded from our review. CONCLUSIONS:Although the level of exposure to floods has been systematically associated with mental health problems, the paucity of longitudinal studies and lack of confounding controls precludes strong conclusions. IMPLICATIONS:We recommend that future research in this area include mixed-method studies that are purposefully designed, using more rigorous methods. Studies should also focus on vulnerable groups and include analyses of policy and practical responses.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine
Science

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
10
Issue :
4
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.9a71342662794198b3f9da03813876a2
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119929