Back to Search Start Over

Symptom management care pathway adaptation process and specific adaptation decisions

Authors :
Emily Vettese
Farha Sherani
Allison A. King
Lolie Yu
Catherine Aftandilian
Christina Baggott
Vibhuti Agarwal
Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian
Kara M. Kelly
David R. Freyer
Etan Orgel
Scott M. Bradfield
Wade Kyono
Michael Roth
Lisa M. Klesges
Melissa Beauchemin
Allison Grimes
George Tomlinson
L. Lee Dupuis
Lillian Sung
Source :
BMC Cancer, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
BMC, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Background There is substantial heterogeneity in symptom management provided to pediatric patients with cancer. The primary objective was to describe the adaptation process and specific adaptation decisions related to symptom management care pathways based on clinical practice guidelines. The secondary objective evaluated if institutional factors were associated with adaptation decisions. Methods Fourteen previously developed symptom management care pathway templates were reviewed by an institutional adaptation team composed of two clinicians at each of 10 institutions. They worked through each statement for all care pathway templates sequentially. The institutional adaptation team made the decision to adopt, adapt or reject each statement, resulting in institution-specific symptom management care pathway drafts. Institutional adaption teams distributed the 14 care pathway drafts to their respective teams; their feedback led to care pathway modifications. Results Initial care pathway adaptation decision making was completed over a median of 4.2 (interquartile range 2.0-5.3) weeks per institution. Across all institutions and among 1350 statements, 551 (40.8%) were adopted, 657 (48.7%) were adapted, 86 (6.4%) were rejected and 56 (4.1%) were no longer applicable because of a previous decision. Most commonly, the reason for rejection was not agreeing with the statement (70/86, 81.4%). Institutional-level factors were not significantly associated with statement rejection. Conclusions Acceptability of the 14 care pathways was evident by most statements being adopted or adapted. The adaptation process was accomplished over a relatively short timeframe. Future work should focus on evaluation of care pathway compliance and determination of the impact of care pathway-consistent care on patient outcomes. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04614662. Registered 04/11/2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04614662?term=NCT04614662&draw=2&rank=1 .

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712407
Volume :
23
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.9a3f34aa87ea426ca2b0df1fb7257623
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10835-0