Back to Search Start Over

Use of colistin in adult patients: A cross-sectional study

Authors :
Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
Carolina Saffioti
Angela Raffaella Losito
Matteo Rinaldi
Caterina Aurilio
Cesare Bolla
Silvia Boni
Guglielmo Borgia
Novella Carannante
Giovanni Cassola
Giancarlo Ceccarelli
Silvia Corcione
Daniela Dalla Gasperina
Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
Chiara Dentone
Stefano Di Bella
Nicoletta Di Lauria
Marcello Feasi
Marco Fiore
Sara Fossati
Erica Franceschini
Andrea Gori
Guido Granata
Sara Grignolo
Paolo Antonio Grossi
Giuliana Guadagnino
Filippo Lagi
Alberto Enrico Maraolo
Valeria Marinò
Maria Mazzitelli
Alessandra Mularoni
Alessandra Oliva
Maria Caterina Pace
Andrea Parisini
Francesca Patti
Nicola Petrosillo
Vincenzo Pota
Francesca Raffaelli
Marianna Rossi
Antonella Santoro
Carlo Tascini
Carlo Torti
Enrico Maria Trecarichi
Mario Venditti
Pierluigi Viale
Alessio Signori
Matteo Bassetti
Valerio Del Bono
Maddalena Giannella
Malgorzata Mikulska
Mario Tumbarello
Claudio Viscoli
Source :
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, Vol 20, Iss , Pp 43-49 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2020.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess colistin use in a country endemic for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB). Methods: Colistin prescription patterns were evaluated in 22 Italian centres. Factors associated with use of colistin in combination with other anti-MDR-GNB agents were also assessed. Results: A total of 221 adults receiving colistin were included in the study. Their median age was 64 years (interquartile range 52–73 years) and 134 (61%) were male. Colistin was mostly administered intravenously (203/221; 92%) and mainly for targeted therapy (168/221; 76%). The most frequent indications for colistin therapy were bloodstream infection and lower respiratory tract infection. Intravenous colistin was administered in combination with at least another anti-MDR-GNB agent in 80% of cases (163/203). A loading dose of 9 MU of colistimethate was administered in 79% of patients receiving i.v. colistin and adequate maintenance doses in 85%. In multivariable analysis, empirical therapy [odds ratio (OR) = 3.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–8.53;P = 0.017] and targeted therapy for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infection (OR = 4.76, 95% CI 1.69–13.43; P = 0.003) were associated with use of colistin in combination with other agents, whilst chronic renal failure (OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.17–0.88; P = 0.024) was associated with use of colistin monotherapy. Conclusion: Colistin remains an important option for severe MDR-GNB infections when other treatments are not available. Despite inherent difficulties in optimising its use owing to peculiar pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics, colistin was mostly used appropriately in a country endemic for MDR-GNB.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22137165 and 37908235
Volume :
20
Issue :
43-49
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.99430e89aa2c4eae9aaaae3790823514
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2019.06.009