Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of the application of an electronic medication management support system in patients with polypharmacy in general practice: a study protocol of cluster-randomised controlled trial (AdAM)

Authors :
Rafael Perera
Holger Pfaff
Peter Ihle
Ferdinand M Gerlach
Paul Glasziou
Ute Karbach
Ana Isabel González-González
Christiane Muth
Thomas Müller
Renate Klaassen-Mielke
Beate S Müller
Sebastian Harder
Juliane Köberlein-Neu
Frank Meyer
Ingo Meyer
Nina Timmesfeld
Truc Sophia Dinh
Hans J Trampisch
Benno Flaig
Daniel Grandt
Reinhard Hammerschmidt
Petra Kellermann-Mühlhoff
Till Beckmann
Lara Düvel
Bastian Surmann
Sara Söling
Simone Grandt
Alexandra Piotrowski
Wolfgang Greiner
Julia Jachmich
Eva Leicher
Benjamin Brandt
Johanna Richard
Mathias Flume
Kiran Chapidi
Robin Brünn
Jale Basten
Karolina Beifuß
Source :
BMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss 9 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2021.

Abstract

Introduction Clinically complex patients often require multiple medications. Polypharmacy is associated with inappropriate prescriptions, which may lead to negative outcomes. Few effective tools are available to help physicians optimise patient medication. This study assesses whether an electronic medication management support system (eMMa) reduces hospitalisation and mortality and improves prescription quality/safety in patients with polypharmacy.Methods and analysis Planned design: pragmatic, parallel cluster-randomised controlled trial; general practices as randomisation unit; patients as analysis unit. As practice recruitment was poor, we included additional data to our primary endpoint analysis for practices and quarters from October 2017 to March 2021. Since randomisation was performed in waves, final study design corresponds to a stepped-wedge design with open cohort and step-length of one quarter. Scope: general practices, Westphalia-Lippe (Germany), caring for BARMER health fund-covered patients. Population: patients (≥18 years) with polypharmacy (≥5 prescriptions). Sample size: initially, 32 patients from each of 539 practices were required for each study arm (17 200 patients/arm), but only 688 practices were randomised after 2 years of recruitment. Design change ensures that 80% power is nonetheless achieved. Intervention: complex intervention eMMa. Follow-up: at least five quarters/cluster (practice). recruitment: practices recruited/randomised at different times; after follow-up, control group practices may access eMMa. Outcomes: primary endpoint is all-cause mortality and hospitalisation; secondary endpoints are number of potentially inappropriate medications, cause-specific hospitalisation preceded by high-risk prescribing and medication underuse. Statistical analysis: primary and secondary outcomes are measured quarterly at patient level. A generalised linear mixed-effect model and repeated patient measurements are used to consider patient clusters within practices. Time and intervention group are considered fixed factors; variation between practices and patients is fitted as random effects. Intention-to-treat principle is used to analyse primary and key secondary endpoints.Ethics and dissemination Trial approved by Ethics Commission of North-Rhine Medical Association. Results will be disseminated through workshops, peer-reviewed publications, local and international conferences.Trial registration NCT03430336. ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03430336).

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
11
Issue :
9
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.9751b5604e1a449c840192fc56606031
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048191