Back to Search Start Over

Relative Body Mass Index Improves the BMI Percentile Performance for Detection and Monitoring of Excess Adiposity in Adolescents

Authors :
Pedro A. Velasquez-Mieyer
Ramfis Nieto-Martinez
Claudia P. Neira
Diana De Oliveira-Gomes
Andres E. Velasquez Rodriguez
Eunice Ugel
Patricia A. Cowan
Source :
Nutrients, Vol 16, Iss 5, p 703 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2024.

Abstract

Obesity is defined as excess adipose tissue; however, commonly used methods may under-detect adiposity in adolescents. This study compared the performance of body mass index percentile (BMI%) and relative body mass index (RBMI) in identifying excess body fat percentage (BF%) and estimated RBMI cut points to better stratify severity of adiposity. In 567 adolescents ages 11–19 year, BF% measured by DXA was used to compare BMI% and RBMI performance at different degrees of adiposity. RBMI cut points for adiposity detection were derived via ROC curve analysis. BF% was strongly correlated with BMI% (r = 0.889, p < 0.001) and RBMI (r = 0.901, p < 0.001). However, RBMI exhibited less dispersion and better discriminated the relationship with BF% independent of age, race, and gender. Both BMI% and RBMI performed similarly for detecting high BF% (≥25 BF% in males; ≥30 BF% in females). Nonetheless, the relationship of BMI% with BF% was diminished among leaner adolescents. RBMI detected overweight in 21.3% more females and 14.2% more males. RBMI improved the detection of excess adiposity in individuals otherwise classified as having normal weight or overweight by BMI%. RBMI is a valuable and accessible tool for earlier detection, intervention, and effective follow-up of excess adiposity in youth at higher risk for complications.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16050703 and 20726643
Volume :
16
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Nutrients
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.9747c89d464643709d5350662e12f9c7
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050703