Back to Search Start Over

Silent Brain Infarcts Following Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Authors :
Ben Indja
Kei Woldendorp
Michael P. Vallely
Stuart M. Grieve
Source :
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, Vol 8, Iss 9 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Wiley, 2019.

Abstract

Background Silent brain infarcts (SBI) are increasingly being recognized as an important complication of cardiac procedures as well as a potential surrogate marker for studies on brain injury. The extent of subclinical brain injury is poorly defined. Methods and Results We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis utilizing studies of SBIs and focal neurologic deficits following cardiac procedures. Our final analysis included 42 studies with 49 separate intervention groups for a total of 2632 patients. The prevalence of SBIs following transcatheter aortic valve implantation was 0.71 (95% CI 0.64‐0.77); following aortic valve replacement 0.44 (95% CI 0.31‐0.57); in a mixed cardiothoracic surgery group 0.39 (95% CI 0.28‐0.49); coronary artery bypass graft 0.25 (95% CI 0.15‐0.35); percutaneous coronary intervention 0.14 (95% CI 0.10‐0.19); and off‐pump coronary artery bypass 0.14 (0.00‐0.58). The risk ratio of focal neurologic deficits to SBI in aortic valve replacement was 0.22 (95% CI 0.15‐0.32); in off‐pump coronary artery bypass 0.21 (95% CI 0.02‐2.04); with mixed cardiothoracic surgery 0.15 (95% CI 0.07‐0.33); coronary artery bypass graft 0.10 (95% CI 0.05‐0.18); transcatheter aortic valve implantation 0.10 (95% CI 0.07‐0.14); and percutaneous coronary intervention 0.06 (95% CI 0.03‐0.14). The mean number of SBIs per patient was significantly higher in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group (4.58 ± 2.09) compared with both the aortic valve replacement group (2.16 ± 1.62, P=0.03) and the percutaneous coronary intervention group (1.88 ± 1.02, P=0.03). Conclusions SBIs are a very common complication following cardiac procedures, particularly those involving the aortic valve. The high frequency of SBIs compared with strokes highlights the importance of recording this surrogate measure in cardiac interventional studies. We suggest that further work is required to standardize reporting in order to facilitate the use of SBIs as a routine outcome measure.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20479980 and 30194849
Volume :
8
Issue :
9
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.95ac3fa11a4f4ac39bc21ef30194849b
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010920