Effects of DNA extraction methods on the real time PCR quantification of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Campylobacter lari in chicken feces and ceca contents

ABSTRACT: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was coupled with a DNA extraction to enumerate Campylobacter spp. from poultry gastrointestinal tract samples. Three experiments were conducted that included: 1) Development of a DNA standard curve related to bacterial DNA primers; 2) Design of a cell/genomic DNA extraction protocol to isolate Campylobacter spp. DNA from complex samples such as poultry feces; and 3) Comparison of PCR quantification to standard plate count methodology. The standard curve using primers for Campylobacter spp. was created for DNA extracted from environmental isolates with a linear range (R2 > 0.95) and with a high specificity for C. coli and C. jejuni recovered from poultry, swine and laboratory isolates. A 2-step extraction process of bacterial DNA from poultry feces was developed in which the cells were first concentrated using a gradient-centrifugation step followed by comparison of 4 DNA extraction methods. Two commercial DNA extraction methods (Zymo Research Quick DNA, and Invitrogen magnetic separation), a traditional phenol-chloroform DNA extraction method using proteinase K to inactivate DNAses, and an in-house isolation method for DNA extraction based on chaotropic salts were used. The middle gradient layer recovered 89% to 98% of the bacteria cells from the sample, with recovery dependent upon the Campylobacter genus. The 4 DNA extractions methods recovered 112 to 302 ug/nL of DNA. Finally, the qPCR and standard plate methods were highly correlated for enumerating Campylobacter spp. in the 2.0 to 8.0-log CFU range. Analyses of the results from this study demonstrate that the combination of the standard curve for Campylobacter spp. DNA primers, the gradient cell concentration method and DNA extraction techniques with qPCR can be used to enumerate Campylobacter spp. from poultry samples with findings similar those of traditional plate count methodology.