Back to Search Start Over

Impact of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction on pulmonary nodule measurements at chest CT: a phantom study

Authors :
Hyungjin Kim
Chang Min Park
Hee-Dong Chae
Sang Min Lee
Jin Mo Goo
Source :
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Vol 21, Iss 6, Pp 459-465 (2015)
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Galenos Publishing House, 2015.

Abstract

PURPOSEWe aimed to identify the impact of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction (IR) on measurement of pulmonary nodules by chest computed tomography (CT).METHODSCT scans were performed on a chest phantom containing various nodules (diameters of 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 mm; +100, -630 and -800 HU for each diameter) at 80, 100, 120 kVp and 10, 20, 50, 100 mAs (a total of 12 radiation dose settings). Each CT was reconstructed using filtered back projection, iDose4, and iterative model reconstruction (IMR). Thereafter, two radiologists measured the diameter and attenuation of the nodules. Noise, contrast-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio of CT images were also obtained. Influence of radiation dose and reconstruction algorithm on measurement error and objective image quality metrics was analyzed using generalized estimating equations.RESULTSThe 80 kVp, 10 mAs CT scan was not feasible for the measurement of 3 mm sized simulated ground-glass nodule (GGN); otherwise, diameter measurement error was not significantly influenced by radiation dose (P > 0.05). IR did not have a significant impact on diameter measurement error for simulated solid nodules (P > 0.05). However, for simulated GGNs, IMR was associated with significantly decreased relative diameter measurement error (P < 0.001). Attenuation measurement error was not significantly influenced by either radiation dose or reconstruction algorithm (P > 0.05). Objective image quality was significantly better with IMR (P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONNodule measurements were not affected by radiation dose except for 3 mm simulated GGN on 80 kVp, 10 mAs dose setting. However, for GGNs, IMR may help reduce diameter measurement error while improving image quality.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13053825 and 13053612
Volume :
21
Issue :
6
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.921b2d37429a43d19274f360dd8d4ac8
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2015.14541