Back to Search Start Over

Broadening the Berlin definition of ARDS to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen: an observational study in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19

Authors :
Fleur-Stefanie L. I. M. van der Ven
Christel M. A. Valk
Siebe Blok
Michelle G. Brouwer
Dai Ming Go
Amanda Lokhorst
Pien Swart
David M. P. van Meenen
Frederique Paulus
Marcus J. Schultz
for the PRoAcT–COVID study investigators
Source :
Annals of Intensive Care, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
SpringerOpen, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Background High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is increasingly used in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. It is uncertain whether a broadened Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in which ARDS can be diagnosed in patients who are not receiving ventilation, results in similar groups of patients receiving HFNO as in patients receiving ventilation. Methods We applied a broadened definition of ARDS in a multicenter, observational study in adult critically ill patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), wherein the requirement for a minimal level of 5 cm H2O PEEP with ventilation is replaced by a minimal level of airflow rate with HFNO, and compared baseline characteristics and outcomes between patients receiving HFNO and patients receiving ventilation. The primary endpoint was ICU mortality. We also compared outcomes in risk for death groups using the PaO2/FiO2 cutoffs as used successfully in the original definition of ARDS. Secondary endpoints were hospital mortality; mortality on days 28 and 90; need for ventilation within 7 days in patients that started with HFNO; the number of days free from HFNO or ventilation; and ICU and hospital length of stay. Results Of 728 included patients, 229 patients started with HFNO and 499 patients with ventilation. All patients fulfilled the broadened Berlin definition of ARDS. Patients receiving HFNO had lower disease severity scores and lower PaO2/FiO2 than patients receiving ventilation. ICU mortality was lower in receiving HFNO (22.7 vs 35.6%; p = 0.001). Using PaO2/FiO2 cutoffs for mild, moderate and severe arterial hypoxemia created groups with an ICU mortality of 16.7%, 22.0%, and 23.5% (p = 0.906) versus 19.1%, 37.9% and 41.4% (p = 0.002), in patients receiving HFNO versus patients receiving ventilation, respectively. Conclusions Using a broadened definition of ARDS may facilitate an earlier diagnosis of ARDS in patients receiving HFNO; however, ARDS patients receiving HFNO and ARDS patients receiving ventilation have distinct baseline characteristics and mortality rates. Trial registration: The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT04719182).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21105820
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Annals of Intensive Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.913638e4d8c24569985261a373b60b6e
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01161-6