Back to Search Start Over

How to shape academic freedom in the digital age? Are the retractions of opinionated papers a prelude to 'cancel culture' in academia?

Authors :
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Source :
Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, Vol 2, Iss , Pp 100035- (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2021.

Abstract

When academics’ opinions, which are published in academic journals as letters to the editor or commentaries, are retracted based on sensitivities and objections that are raised for example on social media, there needs to be a reflection on what this might represent. On one hand, an opinion is precisely that, i.e., a subjective and biased view about an issue. Those views might even be radical, unpopular, or insensitive, but ultimately approved by editors for publication nonetheless. To maintain a truly sustainable scholarly discourse, the best academic way to counter such opinions is by allowing disagreeing voices to express themselves, also as letters to the editor or commentaries. Pressure-induced retractions of opinions not only stifle academic debate, they send the message that opinions need to be moderated and standardized to meet a publishing market that is being increasingly driven by legal parameters, political correctness, as well as business and commercial values rather than academic ones. In an environment of restrictive academic freedom, what emerges is an academia in which the way things are said, tone, and the sensitivity of those that might be affected are given greater weight than the message itself. By cherry-picking parts of the message that detractors or critics might disagree with, the original message may be drowned out by the noise of the objectors. The struggle of academics to liberally voice their opinions in the scholarly publishing realm, and to preserve those opinions, has never been more acute in this age of misinformation and radicalism fueled by polarized social and mass media. Is the politicization and/or commercialization of academia, alongside the retraction of opinions, stifling open and healthy academic debate, or expressing itself as the retraction of opinions, and does this represent a distinct form of “cancel culture” in academia and academic publishing?

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26665182
Volume :
2
Issue :
100035-
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Current Research in Behavioral Sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.900c4800a154d4fba38a71c82145489
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100035