Back to Search Start Over

Implications of PFAS definitions using fluorinated pharmaceuticals

Authors :
Emily Hammel
Thomas F. Webster
Rich Gurney
Wendy Heiger-Bernays
Source :
iScience, Vol 25, Iss 4, Pp 104020- (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2022.

Abstract

Summary: There are 9,000+ per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in existence, which makes studying and regulating PFAS individually, or even as small mixtures, infeasible. Multiple PFAS definitions based on structure have been proposed, yet these definitions do not consider the implications for the full suite of organofluorine chemicals. For example, organofluorine pharmaceuticals, whose use may be essential and are found in human serum and wastewater, are not uniformly identified across all definitions. Using nine definitions prepared by various stakeholders, we screened the 360 organofluorine pharmaceuticals approved and used globally between 1954 and 2021. Definitions ranged in their inclusion of organofluorine pharmaceuticals (1%–100%). The most inclusive definitions include several top prescribed pharmaceuticals, e.g., Prozac and Lipitor. This analysis provides a framework against which organizations can make decisions about how best to proceed when defining PFAS.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25890042
Volume :
25
Issue :
4
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
iScience
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.8fea1e49f6ed4af184440c55ca1d365b
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104020