Back to Search Start Over

Assessing the context within academic health institutions toward improving equity-based, community and patient-engaged research

Authors :
Prajakta Adsul
Shannon Sanchez-Youngman
Elizabeth Dickson
Belkis Jacquez
Alena Kuhlemeier
Michael Muhammad
Katherine J. Briant
Bridgette Hempstead
Jason A. Mendoza
Lisa G. Rosas
Anisha Patel
Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa
Tabia Akintobi
Paige Castro-Reyes
Lori Carter-Edwards
Nina Wallerstein
Source :
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Vol 9 (2025)
Publication Year :
2025
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press, 2025.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The continued momentum toward equity-based, patient/community-engaged research (P/CenR) is pushing health sciences to embrace principles of community-based participatory research. Much of this progress has hinged on individual patient/community–academic partnered research projects and partnerships with minimal institutional support from their academic health institutions. Methods We partnered with three academic health institutions and used mixed methods (i.e., institution-wide survey (n = 99); qualitative interviews with institutional leadership (n = 11); and focus group discussions (6 focus groups with patients and community members (n = 22); and researchers and research staff (n = 9)) to gain a deeper understanding of the institutional context. Results Five key themes emerged that were supported by quantitative data. First, the global pandemic and national events highlighting social injustices sparked a focus on health equity in academic institutions; however, (theme 2) such a focus did not always translate to support for P/CenR nor align with institutional reputation. Only 52% of academics and 79% of community partners believed that the institution is acting on the commitment to health equity (Χ2 = 6.466, p < 0.05). Third, institutional structures created power imbalances and community mistrust which were identified as key barriers to P/CenR. Fourth, participants reported that institutional resources and investments are necessary for recruitment and retention of community-engaged researchers. Finally, despite challenges, participants were motivated to transform current paradigms of research and noted that accountability, communication, and training were key facilitators. Conclusions Triangulating findings from this mixed-methods study revealed critical barriers which provide important targets for interventions to improving supportive policies and practices toward equity-based P/CenR.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20598661
Volume :
9
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.8fb1d900a42241179baa57839bfd97d3
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.675