Back to Search
Start Over
Assessing the context within academic health institutions toward improving equity-based, community and patient-engaged research
- Source :
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Vol 9 (2025)
- Publication Year :
- 2025
- Publisher :
- Cambridge University Press, 2025.
-
Abstract
- Abstract Introduction The continued momentum toward equity-based, patient/community-engaged research (P/CenR) is pushing health sciences to embrace principles of community-based participatory research. Much of this progress has hinged on individual patient/community–academic partnered research projects and partnerships with minimal institutional support from their academic health institutions. Methods We partnered with three academic health institutions and used mixed methods (i.e., institution-wide survey (n = 99); qualitative interviews with institutional leadership (n = 11); and focus group discussions (6 focus groups with patients and community members (n = 22); and researchers and research staff (n = 9)) to gain a deeper understanding of the institutional context. Results Five key themes emerged that were supported by quantitative data. First, the global pandemic and national events highlighting social injustices sparked a focus on health equity in academic institutions; however, (theme 2) such a focus did not always translate to support for P/CenR nor align with institutional reputation. Only 52% of academics and 79% of community partners believed that the institution is acting on the commitment to health equity (Χ2 = 6.466, p < 0.05). Third, institutional structures created power imbalances and community mistrust which were identified as key barriers to P/CenR. Fourth, participants reported that institutional resources and investments are necessary for recruitment and retention of community-engaged researchers. Finally, despite challenges, participants were motivated to transform current paradigms of research and noted that accountability, communication, and training were key facilitators. Conclusions Triangulating findings from this mixed-methods study revealed critical barriers which provide important targets for interventions to improving supportive policies and practices toward equity-based P/CenR.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20598661
- Volume :
- 9
- Database :
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- Journal :
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsdoj.8fb1d900a42241179baa57839bfd97d3
- Document Type :
- article
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.675