Back to Search Start Over

Prospective evaluation of prognostic impact of KIT mutations on acute myeloid leukemia with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and CBFB-MYH11

Authors :
Yuichi Ishikawa
Naomi Kawashima
Yoshiko Atsuta
Isamu Sugiura
Masashi Sawa
Nobuaki Dobashi
Hisayuki Yokoyama
Noriko Doki
Akihiro Tomita
Toru Kiguchi
Shiro Koh
Heiwa Kanamori
Noriyoshi Iriyama
Akio Kohno
Yukiyoshi Moriuchi
Noboru Asada
Daiki Hirano
Kazuto Togitani
Toru Sakura
Maki Hagihara
Tatsuki Tomikawa
Yasuhisa Yokoyama
Norio Asou
Shigeki Ohtake
Itaru Matsumura
Yasushi Miyazaki
Tomoki Naoe
Hitoshi Kiyoi
Source :
Blood Advances, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 66-75 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2020.

Abstract

Abstract: The prognostic impact of KIT mutation on core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) remains controversial. We registered 199 newly diagnosed de novo CBF-AML patients, aged 16 to 64 years, who achieved complete remission. They received 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine therapy and no further treatment until hematological relapse. Mutations in exons 8, 10-11, and 17 of the KIT gene were analyzed. Furthermore, we analyzed mutations in 56 genes that are frequently identified in myeloid malignancies and evaluated minimal residual disease (MRD). The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS) according to KIT mutations. The RFS in KIT-mutated patients was inferior to that in unmutated patients (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-3.00; P = .003). Based on subgroup analysis, KIT mutations had a prognostic impact in patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1, but not in those with CBFB-MYH11, and only exon 17 mutation had a significant prognostic impact. Multivariate Cox regression analysis with stepwise selection revealed that the KIT exon 17 mutation and the presence of extramedullary tumors in patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1, and loss of chromosome X or Y and NRAS mutation in patients with CBFB-MYH11 were poor prognostic factors for RFS. MRD was evaluated in 112 patients, and it was associated with a poorer RFS in the patients with CBFB-MYH11, but not in those with RUNX1-RUNX1T1. These results suggested that it is necessary to separately evaluate AML with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 according to appropriate prognostic factors. This study was registered at www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ as #UMIN000003434.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
24739529
Volume :
4
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Blood Advances
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.8f98219f90f425d95e4fd4f64876f2b
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000709