Review and Comparison of Multi-Method and Mixed Method Application in Research Studies

Purpose: To explore the feasibility of using the multi-method and mixed-method in research studies by reviewing and comparing both methods. Design / Method / Approach: Using the literature, historical background on mixed-methods and multiple-methods design principles are collected and applied in this paper in a systemtic review format. Findings: The major finding from this research is that incorporating quantitative and qualitative data in the form of a mixed or multi-method study has the potential to dramatically increase the accuracy and quality of any research's analysis and conclusions. Theoretical Implications: The study contributes to the theoretical understanding of how mixed and multi-method studies have distinct and distinguishable characteristics, which encourages researchers to conduct investigations appropriately to accomplish their research aims. The authors of this article introduce different designs (e.g., embedded design, explanatory design) which combine the mixed-method with the multi-method approach. Practical Implications: This study concludes that both mixed-methods and multi-methods are reliable and have unique characteristics. Increasing validity (i.e., external validity, generalizability) and reliability of study findings. Originality / Value: The authors of this paper present a taxonomy how to combine mixed-methods with multi-methods. Research Limitations / Future Research: Research should be directed at defining the appropriate design for the multi method to help researchers conduct multi method studies scientifically.