Back to Search Start Over

Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial

Authors :
Susan Ball
Emma Cockcroft
Alex Aylward
Anna Price
Shelley Rhodes
Sarah Morgan-Trimmer
Roy Powell
Elizabeth Gordon
Robert Wickins
John Charity
Jayden van Horik
Aisling Corr
Alison Kerridge
Amy McAndrew
Andrew John Timperley
Source :
BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies, Vol 6, Iss 1 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2024.

Abstract

Objectives Assess the effect of a modified muscle sparing posterior approach; SPAIRE (Save Piriformis and Internus, Repairing Externus), in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures on postoperative mobility and function compared with a standard lateral approach.Design Pragmatic, superiority, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (with internal pilot). Participants, ward staff, and research staff conducting postoperative assessments were blinded to allocation. A CTU allocated treatments centrally using computer-generated lists.Setting Six hospitals in Southwest England, recruiting November 25, 2019–April 25, 2022.Participants 244 adults (≥60 years) requiring hip hemiarthroplasty (122 allocated to each approach). 90 and 85 participants allocated to SPAIRE and lateral, respectively, had primary outcome data within the prespecified data collection window.Interventions Surgery using SPAIRE or standard lateral approach. Follow-up 3 days and 120 days postoperation.Main outcome measure Oxford Hip Score (OHS), via telephone at 120 days. Secondary outcomes: function and mobility (3 days), pain (3 days, 120 days), discharge destination, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality (within 120 days), quality of life and place of residence (120 days).Results Participants’ mean age was 84.6 years (SD 7.2); 168 (69%) were women. Primary outcome: little evidence of a difference in OHS at 120 days; adjusted mean difference (SPAIRE—lateral) −1.23 (95% CI −3.96 to 1.49, p=0.37). Secondary outcomes: indication of lower participant-reported pain at 3 days in SPAIRE arm; no differences between arms for remaining outcomes.Conclusions Participants’ mobility and function are similar in the short term (3 days) and longer term (120 days), whether receiving the SPAIRE or lateral approach. Neither approach confers benefit over the other in terms of length of hospital stay, return to prefracture residence, survival within 120 days, or quality of life at 120 days. Participants receiving SPAIRE approach may experience less pain in the early postoperative period. Modifying the posterior approach in hip hemiarthroplasty to the SPAIRE approach gives equivalent patient outcomes to the lateral approach within 120 days.Trial registration number NCT04095611.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26314940
Volume :
6
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.8f729c6270a64e8c943c0a841ca51695
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000251