Back to Search Start Over

An open toolkit for tracking open science partnership implementation and impact [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Authors :
E. Richard Gold
Sarah E. Ali-Khan
Liz Allen
Lluis Ballell
Manoel Barral-Netto
David Carr
Damien Chalaud
Simon Chaplin
Matthew S. Clancy
Patricia Clarke
Robert Cook-Deegan
A. P. Dinsmore
Megan Doerr
Lisa Federer
Steven A. Hill
Neil Jacobs
Antoine Jean
Osmat Azzam Jefferson
Chonnettia Jones
Linda J. Kahl
Thomas M. Kariuki
Sophie N. Kassel
Robert Kiley
Elizabeth Robboy Kittrie
Bianca Kramer
Wen Hwa Lee
Emily MacDonald
Lara M. Mangravite
Elizabeth Marincola
Daniel Mietchen
Jennifer C. Molloy
Mark Namchuk
Brian A. Nosek
Sébastien Paquet
Claude Pirmez
Annabel Seyller
Malcolm Skingle
S. Nicole Spadotto
Sophie Staniszewska
Mike Thelwall
Source :
Gates Open Research, Vol 3 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
F1000 Research Ltd, 2019.

Abstract

Serious concerns about the way research is organized collectively are increasingly being raised. They include the escalating costs of research and lower research productivity, low public trust in researchers to report the truth, lack of diversity, poor community engagement, ethical concerns over research practices, and irreproducibility. Open science (OS) collaborations comprise of a subset of open practices including open access publication, open data sharing and the absence of restrictive intellectual property rights with which institutions, firms, governments and communities are experimenting in order to overcome these concerns. We gathered two groups of international representatives from a large variety of stakeholders to construct a toolkit to guide and facilitate data collection about OS and non-OS collaborations. Ultimately, the toolkit will be used to assess and study the impact of OS collaborations on research and innovation. The toolkit contains the following four elements: 1) an annual report form of quantitative data to be completed by OS partnership administrators; 2) a series of semi-structured interview guides of stakeholders; 3) a survey form of participants in OS collaborations; and 4) a set of other quantitative measures best collected by other organizations, such as research foundations and governmental or intergovernmental agencies. We opened our toolkit to community comment and input. We present the resulting toolkit for use by government and philanthropic grantors, institutions, researchers and community organizations with the aim of measuring the implementation and impact of OS partnership across these organizations. We invite these and other stakeholders to not only measure, but to share the resulting data so that social scientists and policy makers can analyse the data across projects.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25724754
Volume :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Gates Open Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.8de9a5c77f144a2ac156a12c415c78c
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12958.2