Back to Search Start Over

Application of the international criteria for optic neuritis in the Acute Optic Neuritis Network

Authors :
Philipp Klyscz
Susanna Asseyer
Ricardo Alonso
Charlotte Bereuter
Omer Bialer
Atira Bick
Sara Carta
John J. Chen
Leila Cohen
Yamit Cohen‐Tayar
Edgar Carnero Contentti
Russell C. Dale
Eoin P. Flanagan
Jonathan A. Gernert
Julian Haas
Joachim Havla
Christoph Heesen
Mark Hellmann
Netta Levin
Pablo Lopez
Itay Lotan
Maria Belen Luis
Sara Mariotto
Christina Mayer
Alvaro Jose Mejia Vergara
Cassandra Ocampo
Susana Ochoa
Frederike C. Oertel
Maja Olszewska
José Luis Peralta Uribe
Jaume Sastre‐Garriga
Dario Scocco
Sudarshini Ramanathan
Natthapon Rattanathamsakul
Fu‐Dong Shi
Jemal Shifa
Ilya Simantov
Sasitorn Siritho
Alon Tiosano
Nanthaya Tisavipat
Isabel Torres
Adi Vaknin Dembinsky
Angela Vidal‐Jordana
Adi Wilf‐Yarkoni
Ti Wu
Sol Zamir
Luis Alfonso Zarco
Hanna G. Zimmermann
Axel Petzold
Friedemann Paul
Hadas Stiebel‐Kalish
Source :
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, Vol 11, Iss 9, Pp 2473-2484 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Wiley, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Objective The first international consensus criteria for optic neuritis (ICON) were published in 2022. We applied these criteria to a prospective, global observational study of acute optic neuritis (ON). Methods We included 160 patients with a first‐ever acute ON suggestive of a demyelinating CNS disease from the Acute Optic Neuritis Network (ACON). We applied the 2022 ICON to all participants and subsequently adjusted the ICON by replacing a missing relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) or dyschromatopsia if magnetic resonance imaging pathology of the optical nerve plus optical coherence tomography abnormalities or certain biomarkers are present. Results According to the 2022 ICON, 80 (50%) patients were classified as definite ON, 12 (7%) patients were classified as possible ON, and 68 (43%) as not ON (NON). The main reasons for classification as NON were absent RAPD (52 patients, 76%) or dyschromatopsia (49 patients, 72%). Distribution of underlying ON etiologies was as follows: 78 (49%) patients had a single isolated ON, 41 (26%) patients were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, 25 (16%) patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody‐associated disease, and 15 (9%) with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. The application of the adjusted ON criteria yielded a higher proportion of patients classified as ON (126 patients, 79%). Interpretation According to the 2022 ICON, almost half of the included patients in ACON did not fulfill the requirements for classification of definite or possible ON, particularly due to missing RAPD and dyschromatopsia. Thorough RAPD examination and formal color vision testing are critical to the application of the 2022 ICON.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23289503
Volume :
11
Issue :
9
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.8d3d3b562b3742dd94b0e48725df582d
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52166