Back to Search Start Over

Beyond effectiveness in eHealth trials: Process evaluation of a stepped-care programme to support healthcare workers with psychological distress (RESPOND-HCWs)

Authors :
Roberto Mediavilla
Blanca García-Vázquez
Kerry R. McGreevy
James Underhill
Carmen Bayón
María-Fe Bravo-Ortiz
Ainoa Muñoz-Sanjosé
Josep Maria Haro
Anna Monistrol-Mula
Pablo Nicaise
Papoula Petri-Romão
David McDaid
A-La Park
Maria Melchior
Cécile Vuillermoz
Giulia Turrini
Beatrice Compri
Marianna Purgato
Rinske Roos
Anke B. Witteveen
Marit Sijbrandij
Richard A. Bryant
Daniela Fuhr
José Luis Ayuso-Mateos
Source :
Digital Health, Vol 10 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
SAGE Publishing, 2024.

Abstract

Objectives This study presents the process evaluation of an effective stepped-care programme of eHealth interventions (Doing What Matters in Times of Stress [DWM] and Problem Management Plus [PM+]) for healthcare workers (HCWs) with psychological distress (RESPOND-HCWs trial) conducted in Spain. The aim is to analyse the context in which the programme was delivered, assess key implementation outcomes and explore mechanisms of action. Methods We used mixed methods. Quantitative data came from routine randomised control trial monitoring and structured observation, and qualitative data were collected using semi-structured, in-depth interviews with trial participants ( n = 12) and decision-makers ( n = 7) and a focus group discussion with intervention providers ( n = 7). We conducted a descriptive analysis of quantitative data using R software and a thematic analysis of qualitative data using NVivo. Results Context analysis revealed implementation barriers, including unrealistic expectations of participants about the programme and mental health-related stigma. The flexibility of interventions and the opportunity for mental health actions were enabling factors. Implementation outcomes showed that the trial was feasible, appropriate and timely, and that the intervention was delivered with minimal protocol deviations and good acceptance among participants. Mechanisms of action included confidence in the positive effect of the intervention, a good therapeutic relationship and specific intervention components. Conclusions These results supplement the outcome evaluation and can help inform large-scale implementation in similar settings. Specific recommendations include increasing mental health awareness and reducing stigma in the implementation setting, including a short orientation session and ensuring flexibility in schedules and peer support. Trial registration number NCT04980326.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20552076
Volume :
10
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Digital Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.88ff3bdc1d45f4bbde7284bfdbe51c
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241287678