Back to Search Start Over

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Chromatic Gaussian Process Noise Models for Six Pulsars

Authors :
Bjorn Larsen
Chiara M. F. Mingarelli
Jeffrey S. Hazboun
Aurélien Chalumeau
Deborah C. Good
Joseph Simon
Gabriella Agazie
Akash Anumarlapudi
Anne M. Archibald
Zaven Arzoumanian
Paul T. Baker
Paul R. Brook
H. Thankful Cromartie
Kathryn Crowter
Megan E. DeCesar
Paul B. Demorest
Timothy Dolch
Elizabeth C. Ferrara
William Fiore
Emmanuel Fonseca
Gabriel E. Freedman
Nate Garver-Daniels
Peter A. Gentile
Joseph Glaser
Ross J. Jennings
Megan L. Jones
David L. Kaplan
Matthew Kerr
Michael T. Lam
Duncan R. Lorimer
Jing Luo
Ryan S. Lynch
Alexander McEwen
Maura A. McLaughlin
Natasha McMann
Bradley W. Meyers
Cherry Ng
David J. Nice
Timothy T. Pennucci
Benetge B. P. Perera
Nihan S. Pol
Henri A. Radovan
Scott M. Ransom
Paul S. Ray
Ann Schmiedekamp
Carl Schmiedekamp
Brent J. Shapiro-Albert
Ingrid H. Stairs
Kevin Stovall
Abhimanyu Susobhanan
Joseph K. Swiggum
Haley M. Wahl
David J. Champion
Ismaël Cognard
Lucas Guillemot
Huanchen Hu
Michael J. Keith
Kuo Liu
James W. McKee
Aditya Parthasarathy
Delphine Perrodin
Andrea Possenti
Golam M. Shaifullah
Gilles Theureau
Source :
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol 972, Iss 1, p 49 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
IOP Publishing, 2024.

Abstract

Pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) are designed to detect low-frequency gravitational waves (GWs). GWs induce achromatic signals in PTA data, meaning that the timing delays do not depend on radio frequency. However, pulse arrival times are also affected by radio-frequency-dependent “chromatic” noise from sources such as dispersion measure (DM) and scattering delay variations. Furthermore, the characterization of GW signals may be influenced by the choice of chromatic noise model for each pulsar. To better understand this effect, we assess if and how different chromatic noise models affect the achromatic noise properties in each pulsar. The models we compare include existing DM models used by the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational waves (NANOGrav) and noise models used for the European PTA Data Release 2 (EPTA DR2). We perform this comparison using a subsample of six pulsars from the NANOGrav 15 yr data set, selecting the same six pulsars as from the EPTA DR2 six-pulsar data set. We find that the choice of chromatic noise model noticeably affects the achromatic noise properties of several pulsars. This is most dramatic for PSR J1713+0747, where the amplitude of its achromatic red noise lowers from ${\mathrm{log}}_{10}{A}_{\mathrm{RN}}=-{14.1}_{-0.1}^{+0.1}$ to $-{14.7}_{-0.5}^{+0.3}$ , and the spectral index broadens from ${\gamma }_{\mathrm{RN}}={2.6}_{-0.4}^{+0.5}$ to ${\gamma }_{\mathrm{RN}}={3.5}_{-0.9}^{+1.2}$ . We also compare each pulsar's noise properties with those inferred from the EPTA DR2, using the same models. From the discrepancies, we identify potential areas where the noise models could be improved. These results highlight the potential for custom chromatic noise models to improve PTA sensitivity to GWs.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15384357
Volume :
972
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
The Astrophysical Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.8842134071884eabbb38d4353be68be5
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad5291