Back to Search Start Over

Perceptions of Animal Welfare on Livestock: Evidence from College Agronomy Students in Costa Rica

Authors :
Anthony Valverde
José Andrés González-Miranda
Francisco Sevilla
Sara Mora
Eduardo R. S. Roldan
Celso Vargas
Rodolfo González
Source :
Animals, Vol 14, Iss 10, p 1398 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2024.

Abstract

Ethical considerations regarding our treatment of animals have gained strength, leading to legislation and a societal focus across various disciplines. This is a subject of study within curricula related to agri-food sciences. The aim was to determine the perceptions of agronomy university students concerning animal welfare in livestock production systems. A survey was conducted to encompass various aspects, from participants’ sociodemographic attributes to their attitudes and behaviors regarding animal welfare and the consumption of animal products. Statistical analysis, performed using R software, delved into the associations between participants’ characteristics and their perspectives on the ethical, bioethical, and legal dimensions of animal welfare. Associations between demographic factors and ethical viewpoints among students were identified. Gender differences emerged in animal treatment perceptions, while rural and urban environments impacted perspectives on various animals. Bioethical considerations revealed distinctive disparities based on gender and education in concerns regarding animal welfare, value perceptions, evaluations of animal behaviors, and opinions on animal research. It is crucial to distinguish between animal welfare and the ethical considerations arising from coexisting with sentient beings capable of experiencing suffering. Ethical theories provide a lens through which we perceive our obligations toward animals. The responsibility to ensure animal welfare is firmly rooted in recognizing that animals, like humans, experience pain and physical suffering. Consequently, actions causing unjustified suffering or mistreatment, particularly for entertainment purposes, are considered morally unacceptable.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20762615
Volume :
14
Issue :
10
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Animals
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.877b97e9db034ecca581465b642319eb
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14101398