Quantitative comparison of automated OCT and conventional FAF-based geographic atrophy measurements in the phase 3 OAKS/DERBY trials

MLA

Julia Mai, et al. “Quantitative Comparison of Automated OCT and Conventional FAF-Based Geographic Atrophy Measurements in the Phase 3 OAKS/DERBY Trials.” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, Sept. 2024, pp. 1–9. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71496-y.

APA

Julia Mai, Gregor S. Reiter, Sophie Riedl, Wolf-Dieter Vogl, Amir Sadeghipour, Emma Foos, Alex McKeown, Hrvoje Bogunovic, & Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth. (2024). Quantitative comparison of automated OCT and conventional FAF-based geographic atrophy measurements in the phase 3 OAKS/DERBY trials. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71496-y

Chicago

Julia Mai, Gregor S. Reiter, Sophie Riedl, Wolf-Dieter Vogl, Amir Sadeghipour, Emma Foos, Alex McKeown, Hrvoje Bogunovic, and Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth. 2024. “Quantitative Comparison of Automated OCT and Conventional FAF-Based Geographic Atrophy Measurements in the Phase 3 OAKS/DERBY Trials.” Scientific Reports 14 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71496-y.