Back to Search Start Over

Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol

Authors :
Dean A Fergusson
Greg Knoll
François Lauzier
Simon C Kitto
Jamie Brehaut
Justin Presseau
Ian Ball
Michaël Chasse
Karen E A Burns
Alexis F Turgeon
Frédérick D'Aragon
Jacob Crawshaw
Zack van Allen
Livia Pinheiro Carvalho
Kim Jordison
Shane English
Aimee J Sarti
Claudio Martin
Alvin Ho-ting Li
Marie-Chantal Fortin
Matthew Weiss
Maureen Meade
Pierre Marsolais
Sam Shemie
Sanabelle Zaabat
Sonny Dhanani
Source :
BMJ Open, Vol 9, Iss 12 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2019.

Abstract

Introduction In Canada, deceased organ donation provides over 80% of transplanted organs. At the time of death, families, friends or others assume responsibility as substitute decision-makers (SDMs) to consent to organ donation. Despite their central role in this process, little is known about what barriers, enablers and beliefs influence decision-making among SDMs. This study aims to explore the experiences and perspectives of SDMs involved in making decisions around the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, end-of-life care and deceased organ donation.Methods and analysis SDMs of 60 patients admitted to intensive care units will be enrolled for this study. Ten hospitals across five provinces in Canada in a prospective multicentre qualitative cohort study. We will conduct semistructured telephone interviews in English or French with SDMs between 6 and 8 weeks after the patient’s death. Our sampling frame will stratify SDMs into three groups: SDMs who were not approached for organ donation; SDMs who were approached and consented to donate and SDMs who were approached but did not consent to donate. We will use two complementary theoretical frameworks—the Common-Sense Self-Regulation Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework— to inform our interview guide. Interview data will be analysed using deductive directed content analysis and inductive thematic analysis.Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal Research Ethics Board. The findings from this study will help identify key factors affecting substitute decision-making in deceased organ donation, reasons for non-consent and barriers to achieve congruency between SDM and patient wishes. Ultimately, these data will contribute to the development and evaluation of tools and training for healthcare providers to support SDMs in making decisions about organ donation.Trial registration number NCT03850847.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
9
Issue :
12
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.84c5b2e014e945a08f2125a3c66733fe
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034594