Back to Search Start Over

Cupping Therapy for the Treatment of Migraine Headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Authors :
Bushra Mohandes
Fatma Elsayed Ahmed Bayoumi
Aisha Abdulkarim AllahDiwaya
Maryam Salah Falah
Leen Hesham Alhamd
Razan Abid Alsawadi
Yipeng Sun
Aidi Ma
Idris Sula
Muhammad Candragupta Jihwaprani
Source :
Journal of Pharmacopuncture, Vol 27, Iss 3, Pp 177-189 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Korean Pharmacopuncture Institute, 2024.

Abstract

Objectives: Cupping therapy is a widely used complementary medicine for the treatment of migraine headaches globally. However, conflicting evidence exists on its effectiveness. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cupping therapy in treating migraine headache disorder.Methods: Seven databases were systematically searched: PubMed/MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials. gov, Cochrane CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, SinoMed, and the National Science and Technology Library. The primary endpoints are the treatment success and the pain intensity reduction. The secondary endpoints were adverse events (AEs) risk and improvement in quality of life (QoL), which was based on the Migraine Disability Scale (MIDAS). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the cupping techniques (wet and dry cupping) and adjunctive complementary treatments (i.e. acupuncture and/or collateral pricking).Results: Eighteen trials out of 348 records were included, pooling 1,446 participants (n = 797 received cupping therapy). Treatment success was significantly higher among those with cupping therapy (risk ratio [RR] [95% CI] = 1.83 [1.52-2.21]); with significant improvement observed only with wet cupping (RR [95% CI] = 1.88 [1.53-2.30]). The adjunctive complementary therapy did not achieve a greater amplitude of treatment success compared to cupping therapy alone. Furthermore, cupping therapy showed significant pain reduction compared to baseline (standardized mean difference [SMD] [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.39-0.70]) and achieved fewer risks of AEs (RR [95% CI] = 1.88 [1.53-2.30]). However, cupping did not improve the overall QoL (MIDAS SMD [95% CI] = –0.79 [–3.55-1.98]).Conclusion: Cupping therapy was an effective complementary modality to treat migraine headaches. However, it did not demonstrate improvement in QoL (PROSPERO: CRD42024514509).

Details

Language :
English, Korean
ISSN :
20936966
Volume :
27
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Pharmacopuncture
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.83912a6f525941c499f72cf7043a717a
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3831/KPI.2024.27.3.177