Back to Search Start Over

Characterization of a Set of Small Planets with TESS and CHEOPS and an Analysis of Photometric Performance

Authors :
Dominic Oddo
Diana Dragomir
Alexis Brandeker
Hugh P. Osborn
Karen Collins
Keivan G. Stassun
Nicola Astudillo-Defru
Allyson Bieryla
Steve B. Howell
David R. Ciardi
Samuel Quinn
Jose M. Almenara
César Briceño
Kevin I. Collins
Knicole D. Colón
Dennis M. Conti
Nicolas Crouzet
Elise Furlan
Tianjun Gan
Crystal L. Gnilka
Robert F. Goeke
Erica Gonzales
Mallory Harris
Jon M. Jenkins
Eric L. N. Jensen
David Latham
Nicholas Law
Michael B. Lund
Andrew W. Mann
Bob Massey
Felipe Murgas
George Ricker
Howard M. Relles
Pamela Rowden
Richard P. Schwarz
Joshua Schlieder
Avi Shporer
Sara Seager
Gregor Srdoc
Guillermo Torres
Joseph D. Twicken
Roland Vanderspek
Joshua N. Winn
Carl Ziegler
Source :
The Astronomical Journal, Vol 165, Iss 3, p 134 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
IOP Publishing, 2023.

Abstract

The radius valley carries implications for how the atmospheres of small planets form and evolve, but this feature is visible only with highly precise characterizations of many small planets. We present the characterization of nine planets and one planet candidate with both NASA TESS and ESA CHEOPS observations, which adds to the overall population of planets bordering the radius valley. While five of our planets—TOI 118 b, TOI 262 b, TOI 455 b, TOI 560 b, and TOI 562 b—have already been published, we vet and validate transit signals as planetary using follow-up observations for four new TESS planets, including TOI 198 b, TOI 244 b, TOI 444 b, and TOI 470 b. While a three times increase in primary mirror size should mean that one CHEOPS transit yields an equivalent model uncertainty in transit depth as about nine TESS transits in the case that the star is equally as bright in both bands, we find that our CHEOPS transits typically yield uncertainties equivalent to between two and 12 TESS transits, averaging 5.9 equivalent transits. Therefore, we find that while our fits to CHEOPS transits provide overall lower uncertainties on transit depth and better precision relative to fits to TESS transits, our uncertainties for these fits do not always match expected predictions given photon-limited noise. We find no correlations between number of equivalent transits and any physical parameters, indicating that this behavior is not strictly systematic, but rather might be due to other factors such as in-transit gaps during CHEOPS visits or nonhomogeneous detrending of CHEOPS light curves.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15383881
Volume :
165
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
The Astronomical Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.82a0644b7c4e5187214dded2eae84c
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/acb4e3