Back to Search Start Over

Smartphone-based activity tracking for spine patients: Current technology and future opportunities

Authors :
Adam Leibold
Daniyal Mansoor Ali
James Harrop
Ashwini Sharan
Alexander R. Vaccaro
Ahilan Sivaganesan
Source :
World Neurosurgery: X, Vol 21, Iss , Pp 100238- (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2024.

Abstract

Activity trackers and wearables allow accurate determination of physical activity, basic vital parameters, and tracking of complex medical conditions. This review attempts to provide a roadmap for the development of these applications, outlining the basic tools available, how they can be combined, and what currently exists in the marketplace for spine patients.Various types of sensors currently exist to measure distinct aspects of user movement. These include the accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, barometer, global positioning system (GPS), Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, and microphone. Integration of data from these sensors allows detailed tracking of location and vectors of motion, resulting in accurate mobility assessments. These assessments can have great value for a variety of healthcare specialties, but perhaps none more so than spine surgery. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) are subject to bias and are difficult to track frequently - a problem that is ripe for disruption with the continued development of mobility technology.Currently, multiple mobile applications exist as an extension of clinical care. These include Manage My Surgery (MMS), SOVINITY-e-Healthcare Services, eHealth System, Beiwe Smartphone Application, QS Access, 6WT, and the TUG app. These applications utilize sensor data to assess patient activity at baseline and postoperatively. The results are evaluated in conjunction with PROMs. However, these applications have not yet exploited the full potential of available sensors.There is a need to develop smartphone applications that can accurately track the functional status and activity of spine patients, allowing a more quantitative assessment of outcomes, in contrast to legacy PROMs.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25901397
Volume :
21
Issue :
100238-
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
World Neurosurgery: X
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.823d30f8da414720a59a3f281f1d656f
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100238