Back to Search Start Over

T 1 mapping performance and measurement repeatability: results from the multi-national T 1 mapping standardization phantom program (T1MES)

Authors :
Gabriella Captur
Abhiyan Bhandari
Rüdiger Brühl
Bernd Ittermann
Kathryn E. Keenan
Ye Yang
Richard J. Eames
Giulia Benedetti
Camilla Torlasco
Lewis Ricketts
Redha Boubertakh
Nasri Fatih
John P. Greenwood
Leonie E. M. Paulis
Chris B. Lawton
Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci
Hildo J. Lamb
Richard Steeds
Steve W. Leung
Colin Berry
Sinitsyn Valentin
Andrew Flett
Charlotte de Lange
Francesco DeCobelli
Magalie Viallon
Pierre Croisille
David M. Higgins
Andreas Greiser
Wenjie Pang
Christian Hamilton-Craig
Wendy E. Strugnell
Tom Dresselaers
Andrea Barison
Dana Dawson
Andrew J. Taylor
François-Pierre Mongeon
Sven Plein
Daniel Messroghli
Mouaz Al-Mallah
Stuart M. Grieve
Massimo Lombardi
Jihye Jang
Michael Salerno
Nish Chaturvedi
Peter Kellman
David A. Bluemke
Reza Nezafat
Peter Gatehouse
James C. Moon
on behalf of the T1MES Consortium
Source :
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2020.

Abstract

Abstract Background The T 1 Mapping and Extracellular volume (ECV) Standardization (T1MES) program explored T 1 mapping quality assurance using a purpose-developed phantom with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Conformité Européenne (CE) regulatory clearance. We report T 1 measurement repeatability across centers describing sequence, magnet, and vendor performance. Methods Phantoms batch-manufactured in August 2015 underwent 2 years of structural imaging, B 0 and B 1, and “reference” slow T 1 testing. Temperature dependency was evaluated by the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology and by the German Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt. Center-specific T 1 mapping repeatability (maximum one scan per week to minimum one per quarter year) was assessed over mean 358 (maximum 1161) days on 34 1.5 T and 22 3 T magnets using multiple T 1 mapping sequences. Image and temperature data were analyzed semi-automatically. Repeatability of serial T 1 was evaluated in terms of coefficient of variation (CoV), and linear mixed models were constructed to study the interplay of some of the known sources of T 1 variation. Results Over 2 years, phantom gel integrity remained intact (no rips/tears), B 0 and B 1 homogenous, and “reference” T 1 stable compared to baseline (% change at 1.5 T, 1.95 ± 1.39%; 3 T, 2.22 ± 1.44%). Per degrees Celsius, 1.5 T, T 1 (MOLLI 5s(3s)3s) increased by 11.4 ms in long native blood tubes and decreased by 1.2 ms in short post-contrast myocardium tubes. Agreement of estimated T 1 times with “reference” T 1 was similar across Siemens and Philips CMR systems at both field strengths (adjusted R 2 ranges for both field strengths, 0.99–1.00). Over 1 year, many 1.5 T and 3 T sequences/magnets were repeatable with mean CoVs

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532429X
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.82247d58bee943b7b64d256bcf989b3c
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00613-3