Back to Search Start Over

Validation of the Khorana Venous Thromboembolism Risk Score in Japanese Cancer Patients

Authors :
Fumie Akasaka-Kihara, MD
Daisuke Sueta, MD, PhD
Masanobu Ishii, MD, PhD, MPH
Yuji Maki, MD
Kyoko Hirakawa, MD, PhD
Noriaki Tabata, MD, PhD
Miwa Ito, MD, PhD
Kenshi Yamanaga, MD, PhD
Koichiro Fujisue, MD, PhD
Tadashi Hoshiyama, MD, PhD
Shinsuke Hanatani, MD, PhD
Hisanori Kanazawa, MD, PhD
Seiji Takashio, MD, PhD
Yuichiro Arima, MD, PhD
Satoshi Araki, MD, PhD
Hiroki Usuku, MD, PhD
Taishi Nakamura, MD, PhD
Satoru Suzuki, MD, PhD
Eiichiro Yamamoto, MD, PhD
Hirofumi Soejima, MD, PhD
Koichi Kaikita, MD, PhD
Kenichi Matsushita, MD, PhD
Masao Matsuoka, MD, PhD
Koichiro Usuku, MD, PhD
Kenichi Tsujita, MD, PhD
Source :
JACC: Asia, Vol 1, Iss 2, Pp 259-270 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2021.

Abstract

Background: Although the Khorana venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk score (KRS) is well recognized as a simple VTE risk assessment method in patients with cancer, whether it is suitable for Asian populations is unclear. Objectives: This study validated KRS for the prediction of VTE and investigated the value of the KRS in predicting mortality in Japanese patients with cancer. Methods: A body mass index value of 25 kg/m2 or more was defined as obesity according to World Health Organization consensus. A total of 27,687 patients with cancer were subdivided into low- (0), intermediate- (1-2), and high-score (3) groups by the KRS. The primary and secondary endpoints were VTE and all-cause mortality, respectively. Results: The prevalence of VTE was 1.7%, 7.3%, and 11.0% for low-, intermediate-, and high-score patients, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the KRS significantly predicted VTE (area under the curve, 0.679; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.666-0.692; P < 0.001). The cutoff value for the KRS was 1.0. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the KRS was an independent predictor of VTE (odds ratio 1.766; 95% CI 1.673-1.865; P < 0.01). The cutoff value of the KRS for all-cause mortality determined by ROC analysis was 2.0. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of mortality in the KRS ≥2 group than in the KRS 0-1 group (log-rank: P < 0.01). Conclusions: The KRS was useful in Japanese patients with cancer and might be a potentially useful marker for the prediction of mortality. Establishing optimal scores for Japanese subjects is mandatory because of its low diagnostic ability. (KUMAMON Cancer registry; UMIN000047554)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
27723747
Volume :
1
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
JACC: Asia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.8093e58af58c482284f263c806d874fc
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.07.006