Back to Search Start Over

Exploring the Characteristics and Preferences for Online Support Groups: Mixed Method Study

Authors :
Plinsinga, Melanie Louise
Besomi, Manuela
Maclachlan, Liam
Melo, Luciano
Robbins, Sarah
Lawford, Belinda J
Teo, Pek Ling
Mills, Kathryn
Setchell, Jenny
Egerton, Thorlene
Eyles, Jillian
Hall, Leanne
Mellor, Rebecca
Hunter, David J
Hodges, Paul
Vicenzino, Bill
Bennell, Kim
Source :
Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol 21, Iss 12, p e15987 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
JMIR Publications, 2019.

Abstract

BackgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, disabling, and prevalent disorder. As there is no cure for OA, long-term self-management is paramount. Support groups (SGs) can facilitate self-management among people living with OA. Understanding preferences in design and features of SGs, including online SGs (OSGs), among people with OA can inform future development of SG interventions for this condition. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate health care– and health information–seeking behavior, digital literacy, and preferences for the design of SGs in people with OA. The study also explored the perceived barriers and enablers to being involved in OSGs. MethodsAn online survey study was conducted with a mixed method design (quantitative and qualitative). Individuals aged ≥45 years with knee, hip, or back pain for ≥3 months were recruited from an extant patient database of the Institute of Bone and Joint Research via email invitations. Quantitative elements of the survey included questions about sociodemographic background; health care– and health information–seeking behavior; digital literacy; and previous participation in, and preferences for, SGs and OSGs. Respondents were classified into 2 groups (Yes-SG and No-SG) based on previous participation or interest in an SG. Group differences were assessed with Chi-square tests (significance level set at 5%). Responses to free-text questions relating to preferences regarding OSG engagement were analyzed qualitatively using an inductive thematic analysis. ResultsA total of 415 people with OA completed the survey (300/415, 72.3% females; 252/415, 61.0% lived in a major city). The Yes-SG group included 307 (307/415, 73.9%) participants. Between the Yes-SG and No-SG groups, there were no differences in sociodemographic characteristics, health care– and health information–seeking behavior, and digital literacy. An online format was preferred by 126/259 (48.7%) of the Yes-SG group. Trained peer facilitators were preferred, and trustworthiness of advice and information were highly prioritized by the respondents. Qualitative analysis for OSG participation revealed 5 main themes. Lack of time and motivation were the main barriers identified. The main enablers were related to accessibility, enjoyment of the experience, and the content of the discussed information. ConclusionsThese findings highlight the preferences in design features and content of SGs and OSGs and may assist in the further development of such groups.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14388871
Volume :
21
Issue :
12
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.7c707ce154504175af8bf185caed625c
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2196/15987