Back to Search Start Over

Beyond the hype: deep neural networks outperform established methods using a ChEMBL bioactivity benchmark set

Authors :
Eelke B. Lenselink
Niels ten Dijke
Brandon Bongers
George Papadatos
Herman W. T. van Vlijmen
Wojtek Kowalczyk
Adriaan P. IJzerman
Gerard J. P. van Westen
Source :
Journal of Cheminformatics, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
BMC, 2017.

Abstract

Abstract The increase of publicly available bioactivity data in recent years has fueled and catalyzed research in chemogenomics, data mining, and modeling approaches. As a direct result, over the past few years a multitude of different methods have been reported and evaluated, such as target fishing, nearest neighbor similarity-based methods, and Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR)-based protocols. However, such studies are typically conducted on different datasets, using different validation strategies, and different metrics. In this study, different methods were compared using one single standardized dataset obtained from ChEMBL, which is made available to the public, using standardized metrics (BEDROC and Matthews Correlation Coefficient). Specifically, the performance of Naïve Bayes, Random Forests, Support Vector Machines, Logistic Regression, and Deep Neural Networks was assessed using QSAR and proteochemometric (PCM) methods. All methods were validated using both a random split validation and a temporal validation, with the latter being a more realistic benchmark of expected prospective execution. Deep Neural Networks are the top performing classifiers, highlighting the added value of Deep Neural Networks over other more conventional methods. Moreover, the best method (‘DNN_PCM’) performed significantly better at almost one standard deviation higher than the mean performance. Furthermore, Multi-task and PCM implementations were shown to improve performance over single task Deep Neural Networks. Conversely, target prediction performed almost two standard deviations under the mean performance. Random Forests, Support Vector Machines, and Logistic Regression performed around mean performance. Finally, using an ensemble of DNNs, alongside additional tuning, enhanced the relative performance by another 27% (compared with unoptimized ‘DNN_PCM’). Here, a standardized set to test and evaluate different machine learning algorithms in the context of multi-task learning is offered by providing the data and the protocols. Graphical Abstract .

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17582946
Volume :
9
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Cheminformatics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.7b4cd96fb77d4f8a8fa9c97283483c7f
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-017-0232-0