Back to Search Start Over

When antivirals backfire: An evaluation of favipiravir’s clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A multicenter cohort study

Authors :
Khalid Al Sulaiman
Ohoud Aljuhani
Ghazwa B. Korayem
Ali F. Altebainawi
Mashael AlFaifi
Majed Nahari
Alaa Almagthali
Abrar K. Thabit
Raghad Alhajaji
Reham Alharbi
Khawla Kahtani
Abeer A. Alenazi
Aisha Alharbi
Munirah M. Alghwainm
Sara M. Alotaibi
Yazeed S. Alghamdi
Samar Alotaibi
Shaden H. Alonazi
Jumanah M. Almutairi
Ramesh Vishwakarma
Source :
Journal of Infection and Public Health, Vol 16, Iss 9, Pp 1492-1499 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2023.

Abstract

Background: Favipiravir is an oral antiviral, that might treat COVID-19 by enhancing viral eradication, particularly in patients with mild-to-moderate disease. Yet, the findings on the use of favipiravir in critically ill patients with COVID-19 are inconsistent. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of favipiravir in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Method: A multicenter retrospective cohort study includes critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) was conducted from March 2020 to July 2021. Patients were categorized based on favipiravir use (control vs. favipiravir). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, 30-day mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and complications during the stay. Results: After propensity score (PS) matching (1:1 ratio), 146 patients were included in the final analysis. A higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality were observed in patients receiving favipiravir compared to the control group at crude analysis (65.3% vs. 43.8%; P-value=0.009 and 56.3% vs. 40.3; P-value=0.06, respectively); however, no differences were observed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (HR 1.17; 95% CI 0.73, 1.87; P-value =0.51 and HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.53, 1.39; P-value=0.53, respectively). Conversely, the MV duration and ICU LOS were longer in patients who received favipiravir than the control group (β coefficient 0.51; CI 0.09, 0.92; P-value = 0.02, β coefficient 0.41; CI 0.17, 0.64; P-value = 0.0006, respectively). Complications during the stay were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: The use of favipiravir in critically ill patients with COVID-19 did not demonstrate a reduction in mortality; instead, it was linked with longer MV duration and ICU stay. This finding suggests limiting favipiravir use to infections where it is more effective, other than COVID-19. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18760341
Volume :
16
Issue :
9
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Infection and Public Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.79d18e3055ca4f70a4b4422350e807d0
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2023.06.011