Back to Search Start Over

Optimizing a mentorship program from the perspective of academic medicine leadership – a qualitative study

Authors :
Michael Ren
Dorothy Choi
Chloe Chan
Simrit Rana
Umberin Najeeb
Mireille Norris
Simron Singh
Karen E. A. Burns
Sharon E. Straus
Gillian Hawker
Catherine Yu
Source :
BMC Medical Education, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMC, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Background Effective mentorship is an important contributor to academic success. Given the critical role of leadership in fostering mentorship, this study sought to explore the perspectives of departmental leadership regarding 1) current departmental mentorship processes; and 2) crucial components of a mentorship program that would enhance the effectiveness of mentorship. Methods Department Division Directors (DDDs), Vice-Chairs, and Mentorship Facilitators from the Department of Medicine at the University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine were interviewed between April and December 2021 using a semi-structured guide. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, then coded. Analysis occurred in 2 steps: 1) codes were organized to identify emergent themes; then 2) the Social Ecological Model (SEM) was applied to interpret the findings. Results Nineteen interviews (14 DDDs, 3 Vice-Chairs, and 2 Mentorship Facilitator) were completed. Analysis revealed three themes: (1) a culture of mentorship permeated the department as evidenced by rigorous mentorship processes, divisional mentorship innovations, and faculty that were keen to mentor; (2) barriers to the establishment of effective mentoring relationships existed at 3 levels: departmental, interpersonal (mentee-mentor relationships), and mentee; and (3) strengthening the culture of mentorship could entail scaling up pre-existing mentorship processes and promoting faculty engagement. Application of SEM highlighted critical program features and determined that two components of interventions (creating tools to measure mentorship outcomes and systems for mentor recognition) were potential enablers of success. Conclusions Establishing ‘mentorship outcome measures’ can incentivize and maintain relationships. By tangibly delineating departmental expectations for mentorship and creating systems that recognize mentors, these measures can contribute to a culture of mentorship.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14726920
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Medical Education
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.794e140415e3451592ff94422ca50faa
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05463-6