Back to Search Start Over

The clinical utility and costs of whole-genome sequencing to detect cancer susceptibility variants—a multi-site prospective cohort study

Authors :
Aimee L. Davidson
Uwe Dressel
Sarah Norris
Daffodil M. Canson
Dylan M. Glubb
Cristina Fortuno
Georgina E. Hollway
Michael T. Parsons
Miranda E. Vidgen
Oliver Holmes
Lambros T. Koufariotis
Vanessa Lakis
Conrad Leonard
Scott Wood
Qinying Xu
Amy E. McCart Reed
Hilda A. Pickett
Mohammad K. Al-Shinnag
Rachel L. Austin
Jo Burke
Elisa J. Cops
Cassandra B. Nichols
Annabel Goodwin
Marion T. Harris
Megan J. Higgins
Emilia L. Ip
Catherine Kiraly-Borri
Chiyan Lau
Julia L. Mansour
Michael W. Millward
Melissa J. Monnik
Nicholas S. Pachter
Abiramy Ragunathan
Rachel D. Susman
Sharron L. Townshend
Alison H. Trainer
Simon L. Troth
Katherine M. Tucker
Mathew J. Wallis
Maie Walsh
Rachel A. Williams
Ingrid M. Winship
Felicity Newell
Emma Tudini
John V. Pearson
Nicola K. Poplawski
Helen G. Mar Fan
Paul A. James
Amanda B. Spurdle
Nicola Waddell
Robyn L. Ward
Source :
Genome Medicine, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
BMC, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Background Many families and individuals do not meet criteria for a known hereditary cancer syndrome but display unusual clusters of cancers. These families may carry pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes and be at higher risk for developing cancer. Methods This multi-centre prospective study recruited 195 cancer-affected participants suspected to have a hereditary cancer syndrome for whom previous clinical targeted genetic testing was either not informative or not available. To identify pathogenic disease-causing variants explaining participant presentation, germline whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and a comprehensive cancer virtual gene panel analysis were undertaken. Results Pathogenic variants consistent with the presenting cancer(s) were identified in 5.1% (10/195) of participants and pathogenic variants considered secondary findings with potential risk management implications were identified in another 9.7% (19/195) of participants. Health economic analysis estimated the marginal cost per case with an actionable variant was significantly lower for upfront WGS with virtual panel ($8744AUD) compared to standard testing followed by WGS ($24,894AUD). Financial analysis suggests that national adoption of diagnostic WGS testing would require a ninefold increase in government annual expenditure compared to conventional testing. Conclusions These findings make a case for replacing conventional testing with WGS to deliver clinically important benefits for cancer patients and families. The uptake of such an approach will depend on the perspectives of different payers on affordability.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1756994X
Volume :
15
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Genome Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.7517b7792c7450392b54b67bde9ca87
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-023-01223-1